AS THE ROOSTER CROWS: A DIFFERENT GROUP FOR INCREASING HUMAN OKness

AS THE ROOSTER CROWS: A DIFFERENT GROUP FOR INCREASING HUMAN OKness is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered to the public.

By RICHARD JOHN STAPLETON

The new and different computer-based system will be able to assimilate and accommodate forty group members and a group leader seated around the perimeter of one computer screen, with a colorful copper rooster standing in the center of the screen that will raucously crow when it spins to randomly-select and point out Leaders of the Moment to start democratic group discussions.

Systems vaguely similar to the new computer-based group management system now being constructed are already used by tv news networks. The new zoom technology is gaining acceptance, changing tv newscasting, and is being used by various individuals, groups, and organizations. Some tv networks are already doing something similar to what Rout conceived with three or four experts shown on tv screens at once who are zoomed into focus when they’re selected to say something by group leaders using various authoritarian algorithmic rules and criteria. 

The strangeness of the Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK process in the first two meetings caused Not-OKness to increase in most group members, but as the months rolled by the members began to experience increased OKness and satisfaction. Those entering the process with I’m Not OK—You’re OK; I’m Not-OK—You’re Not OK; and I’m OK—You’re Not OK life positions by the end of the last session generally spent more time in the I’m OK—You’re OK winner quadrant of the OK Corral, the upper right quadrant of a mathematical space encompassing two axes crossing at zero in the center of the space, with negative and positive OKness estimated west and east of origin on the horizontal axis and positive and negative OKness estimated north and south of origin on the vertical axis, with I being the vertical axis and You being the horizontal axis. Intersecting I and You positive or negative OKness combinations for specific individuals could exist at points in all four quadrants of the OK Corral.

OKness cannot be precisely measured, but it can be estimated by observing others and by self-evaluation. Most humans if they think about it know if they are OK or Not OK at any moment. OK relative to what? Relative to how OK one was yesterday, or six months ago? And how OK about what? Yes, estimating OKness has to be a subjective judgement call, but it can be done. It also can be done estimating how OK someone else is. Most humans can see and hear by observation when someone is OK or Not OK.

There are two basic types of OKness: Psychological and Social.

Social OKness is generally talked about.

Psychological OKness is generally not talked about.

In many cases humans are socially OK but psychologically abysmal.

Social OKness is based on fact relative to standards concerned with whether and to what degree goals, objectives, and missions have been achieved, such as whether someone has adequate food, clothing, and shelter. If someone is hungry, cold, and miserable it’s an objective fact s/he is Not OK. If someone is in acute physical pain caused by an accident, malnutrition, or disease s/he is Not OK. The same is true for individuals who cannot function in society because of emotional, mental, and behavioral disorders caused by traumatic genetic and social inheritances.  

Psychological OKness is a judgmental subjective opinion an individual holds regarding her/himself and others not based on current objective data and information that is concerned with focal points such as sex, gender, race, overall appearance, behavioral traits, personality traits, intelligence, knowledge, beliefs, abilities, and worthiness.     

Rout’s group members were all socially OK in the sense they were all functioning members of society and were getting their needs met at levels that provided OK levels of satisfaction, not great levels of satisfaction necessarily but OK levels. On the other hand, they all had life positions with respect to some humans that were non-I’m OK—You’re OK: regarding such things as races, sexual orientations, religions, abortions, economic classes, social classes, professions, and political parties. The members were unequally OK regarding all issues.

The members learned in Rout’s group how to transact with one another socially using I’m OK—You’re OK and Adult ego states and how not to play psychological Games; but their psychological structural programming and scripting was left largely intact. Some increases in psychological OKness probably happened over the course of the six once-a-month six-hour weekend meetings; but significantly changing psychological structural programming for all group members would take years of group sessions and more intimate discussions than what happened in Rout’s group.

Rout was surprised however at how quickly the group adapted to increase social OKness, proving in his mind and in the minds of a majority of his donor group that the random-selection democratic process used with humans from disparate walks of life has merit and would produce positive social results around Earth if it were widely used. He and the group donors decided this result was good enough to call The Group experiment a success, so they decided to disband the group permanently, deciding to focus instead on developing software for a new computer-based democratic Adult I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free system, in a new non-profit corporation Spaceship Earth, Inc., to change dysfunctional social level transactions around Spaceship Earth as soon and widely as possible, to encourage and foster liberty, equality, fraternity and general OKness.

Ideally the new computer-based Adult ego state Game-free system and fraternal democracy chapters will take root and evolve in usage around Spaceship Earth to produce results analogous to those produced by The Group, eventually evolving group participation by many millions of Earthian humans. What is the probability this will happen? Probably less than .25, but Rout and a majority of his donors thought the goal was worth pursuing. All the donors have a lot of money and they were glad to wager some of it on something that might produce truly significant social results for all Earthian humans. Some of the donors had already tried to no avail to get the I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government to increase their income taxes to provide money for infrastructure projects to help lower-class and middle-class USian citizens; but this was prevented by I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian presidents and congress people who were financed by I’m OK—You’re Not OK elite rich citizens and large corporations (primarily repugnant Repugs but also dim Dems) who did not want their income taxes increased.

One donor thought the new proposed computer-based I’m OK—You’re OK democratic sortition discussion system might become the social equivalent of a Salk vaccine to prevent violence around Spaceship Earth. Without doubt the USian government is in need of such a process in all its branches, as are almost all Earthian governments; but the process is especially needed by the haughty high and mighty I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government dealing with other nations, playing over and over since 1945 second and third-degree versions of the one-up psychological Game NIGYSOB, Now I’ve Got You, You SOB, using Not OK covert psychological sabotages, overt sanctions, bombing from the air, and shooting on the ground.

Thus far no tv network has set up a fully democratic Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK Spaceship Earth-type program with participants randomly-selected from disparate walks of real life who are randomly-selected as Leaders of the Moment in a group to start a democratic discussion of an existential Earthian problem, by defining and discussing a serious problem of the moment in her or his opinion happening anywhere around Spaceship Earth, that includes delineating alternatives for dealing with the problem and making recommendations for doing something about the problem.

After the The Truther randomly-selected Leader of the Moment decides to stop speaking, other group members will discuss the problem the leader brought up agreeing or disagreeing with what the leader said in the order in which they raise their hands until the discussion runs out of steam, at which time the rooster Truther will be spun again if time remains in the session, to randomly-select a new Leader of the Moment who will bring up and discuss a new problem. I’m OK—You’re Not OK group members who play filibuster-like psychological Games talking just for sake of talking or to sabotage the development of co-constructed consensual answers will be summarily stopped by a clanging cowbell. Miscreant members of the group will be removed from the screen and permanently banished from the group if they persist with their anti-social behavior.

How to reward participants is an issue. Will Earthian humans participate in such a system for strokes, belonging, structure, stimulation, recognition, personal achievement, and personal satisfaction? Can Earthian humans learn to look upon themselves as equal I’m OK—You’re OK stockholders of Spaceship Earth, Inc., co-constructing with fellow stockholders around Spaceship Earth democratic consensual answers for managing Spaceship Earth states of affairs from the bottom up?

Would Spaceship Earth fraternal chapter discussions be entertaining enough to be shown on tv networks?

Would members of the elite rich such as Harrison in Rout’s The Group learn to accept the computer-based system and the salutary benefits of the I’m OK—You’re OK Adult Game-free discussion process?

They might accept the system if they thought it might eventually lead to all Earthian humans receiving Spaceship Earth, Inc. dividend checks similar to those proposed in the essay, “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”, at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc-3/.

Not all members of Rout’s discussion group or the donor group agreed that The Group had been a success. A sizeable minority of both group members and donors were convinced The Group could not have been formed had the participants not been bribed with money to participate and the seeming OKness increases produced in the group was pseudo OKness that was produced not by genuine structural changes within the psyches of the participants but by Rout’s dictatorial rules and demeanor and his threats to banish participants if they refused to abide by the group’s I’m OK—You’re OK Adult ego state Game-free democratic rules and laws.

According to this view, fundamental laws of cause-effect human nature cannot be changed and as soon as the money is removed the participants of The Group will revert back to their previous levels of OKness or Not OKness. This view assumes humans are inherently mercenary and self-interested and will only do what they perceive will enhance their personal life positions, only doing what they think will do them some good.  Such a view proposes humans from the moment of birth are incessantly goaded into doing what they do by myriad differentiated inexorably progressing infinitely-regressive cause-effect chains in families and in myriad groups and organizations generating differentiated psychological and social script messages, rewards, and punishments that through time create internal psychological feeling, thinking, knowing, believing, and doing structures and programs in individual Earthian humans, that never change, barring force majeure events.

Rout and a small majority of his group members and donors agree with the proposition that individual Earthian humans are closed systems that cannot change using free will their subconscious feeling, thinking, and doing structures that have been introjected into, embedded, and ingrained in their brain cells through time; but they also believe—if external states of nature can be changed to some degree by current Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic co-constructed consensual answers—co-constructed by large numbers of Earthian humans from all walks of life correcting Not OK predetermined OKness positions, time structuring patterns, ego states, transactional patterns, Games, Rackets, script messages, and life scripts—Spaceship Earth can be saved. They think there is some chance the new Spaceship Earth Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic Game-free computer-based discussion system widely downloaded in computers around Spaceship Earth by I’m OK—You’re OK fraternal democracy chapters might cause I’m OK—You’re Not OK authoritarian psychological, social, economic, religious, educational, governmental, military, and political forces to change in such a way that human extinction might be prevented.

Some of the observable social OKness increases in The Group were probably caused by nothing more than the members being forced to communicate in Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK ways with humans from disparate social, economic, religious, and political walks and levels of life. This changed the state of nature for The Group members. Merely having lunch with and chit-chatting with uncommon and unequal group participants before and after group sessions caused many of The Group members to feel more OK about themselves and others. Whether they will revert back to their previous levels of OKness or Not OKness now that The Group has been disbanded, making them again fully dependent on their accidentally or inevitably-caused family members, friends, buddies, cliques, confidants, associates, bosses, gang members, church members, etc. for strokes, stimulation, recognition, belonging, structure, and money, remains to be seen.

I’m OK—You’re OK elite rich Earthian humans in their golden years bored with watching their investment accounts automatically increase by thousands and millions of dollars every year, billions a year in some cases, can gamble billions of their surplus dollars without jeopardizing their security donating to Spaceship Earth, Inc. to hire computer experts to flow chart and write code for the new Spaceship Earth computer-based Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK democratic consensual answer system; recruit, establish, and administer I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free fraternal democracy chapters around Spaceship Earth; purchase thousands of desktop computers for impoverished chapter members; and download the new program to millions of computers, to possibly prevent not only the extinction of homo sapiens but also the extinctions of millions of other species of fauna and flora living around Spaceship Earth.  

That’s a big bet worth taking. 

__________________________________

Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, certified transactional analyst, educator, octogenarian emeritus professor of management, writer, editor and publisher at Effective Learning Company   

ROUT LOGGER’S GROUP: A BRIGHT IDEA TO SAVE HUMANITY

Rout Logger’s Group: A Bright Idea to Save Humanity is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered to the public.

Copyright 2020 by Effective Learning Publications. All rights reserved. No part of this Internet novel may be copied or printed on paper without permission. Share on the Internet as you wish.

To refresh yourself about what happened in earlier episodes, go to the following website addresses:

Internet Episode 1, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-part-1/.   

Internet Episode 2, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-2/.

Internet Episode 3, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-three/.

Internet Episode 4, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-four/.

Internet Episode 5, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-five/.

Internet Episode 6,  https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-six/  

Internet Episode 7, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/rout-loggers-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-7/

A list of names of forty cast members with a short biographical blurb about each is presented in Internet Episode 1.

INTERNET EPISODE EIGHT

Group members were not surprised that Rout decided to cancel The Group meetings because of the Covid pandemic.

They had no desire to go to monthly meetings requiring air travel exposing them to the Corona virus in airports, airplanes, hotels, and restaurants; but most were surprised that Rout decided to discontinue The Group permanently. They thought he would start it back up after the Corona problem went away. They were also surprised he gave them another five thousand dollars in severance pay in July 2020. They had not been paid for cancelled meetings in the months of April, May, and June of 2020.

Rout and the donors seriously considered using some sort of zoom process with the members working from home in group meetings, but they decided this was not worth pursuing at this time using available technology.

The group members were disappointed things turned out as they did and felt a sense of loss. While some criticized and resented Rout’s rules, arbitrary decisions, and stern uncaring demeanor they had found the overall experience to be satisfying, and they knew they had been well compensated for their time and participation.

The strangeness of the process in the first two meetings caused Not-OKness to increase in most group members, but as the months rolled by the members began to experience increased OKness and satisfaction. Those entering the process with I’m Not OK—You’re OK; I’m Not-OK—You’re Not OK; and I’m OK—You’re Not OK life positions by the end of the last session generally spent more time in the I’m OK—You’re OK winner quadrant of the OK Corral, the upper right quadrant of a mathematical space encompassing two axes crossing at zero in the center of the space, with negative and positive OKness estimated west and east of origin on the horizontal axis and positive and negative OKness estimated north and south of origin on the vertical axis, with I being the vertical axis and You being the horizontal axis. Intersecting I and You positive or negative OKness combinations for specific individuals could exist at points in all four quadrants of the OK Corral.

OKness cannot be precisely measured, but it can be estimated by observing others and by self-evaluation. Most humans if they think about it know if they are OK or Not OK at any moment. How OK is another matter. OK relative to what? Relative to how OK one was yesterday, or six months ago? And how OK about what? Yes, estimating OKness has to be a subjective judgement call, but it can be done. It also can be done estimating how OK someone else is. Most humans can see and hear by observation when someone is OK or Not OK.

There are two basic types of OKness: Psychological and Social.

Social OKness is generally talked about.

Psychological OKness is generally not talked about.

In many cases humans are socially OK but psychologically abysmal.

Social OKness is based on fact relative to standards concerned with whether and to what degree goals, objectives, and missions have been achieved, such as whether someone has adequate food, clothing, and shelter. If someone is hungry, cold, and miserable it’s an objective fact s/he is Not OK. If someone is in acute physical pain caused by an accident, malnutrition, or disease s/he is Not OK. The same is true for individuals who cannot function in society because of emotional, mental, and behavioral disorders caused by traumatic genetic and social inheritances.  

Psychological OKness is a judgmental subjective opinion an individual holds regarding her/himself and others not based on current objective data and information that is concerned with focal points such as sex, gender, race, overall appearance, behavioral traits, personality traits, intelligence, knowledge, beliefs, abilities, and worthiness.     

Rout’s group members were all socially OK in the sense they were all functioning members of society and were getting their needs met at levels that provided OK levels of satisfaction, not great levels of satisfaction necessarily but OK levels. On the other hand, they all had life positions with respect to some humans that were non-I’m OK—You’re OK: regarding such things as races, sexual orientations, religions, abortions, economic classes, social classes, professions, and political parties. The members were unequally OK regarding all issues.

The members learned in Rout’s group how to transact with one another socially using I’m OK—You’re OK and Adult ego states and how not to play psychological Games; but their psychological structural programming and scripting was left largely intact. Some increases in psychological OKness probably happened over the course of the six monthly meetings; but significantly changing psychological structural programming for all group members would take years of group sessions and more intimate discussions than what happened in Rout’s group.

Rout was surprised however at how quickly the group adapted to increase social OKness, proving in his mind and in the minds of a majority of his donor group that the random-selection democratic process used with humans from disparate walks of life has merit and would produce positive social results around Earth if it were widely used. He and the group donors decided this result was good enough to call The Group experiment a success, so they decided to disband the group permanently, deciding to focus instead on developing software for a new computer-based democratic Adult I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free system, in a new non-profit corporation Spaceship Earth, Inc., to change dysfunctional social level transactions around Spaceship Earth as soon and widely as possible, to encourage and foster liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Ideally the new computer-based Adult ego state Game-free system and fraternal democracy chapters will take root and evolve in usage around Spaceship Earth to produce results analogous to those produced by The Group, eventually evolving group participation by many millions of Earthian humans. What is the probability this will happen? Probably less than .25, but Rout and a majority of his donors thought the goal was worth pursuing. All the donors have a lot of money and they were glad to wager some of it on something that might produce truly significant social results for all Earthian humans. Some of the donors had already tried to no avail to get the I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government to increase their income taxes to provide money for infrastructure projects to help lower-class and middle-class USian citizens; but this was prevented by I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian presidents and congress people who were financed by I’m OK—You’re Not OK elite rich citizens and large corporations (primarily repugnant Repugs but also dim Dems) who did not want their income taxes increased.

One donor thought the new proposed computer-based I’m OK—You’re OK democratic sortition discussion system might become the social equivalent of a Salk vaccine to prevent violence around Spaceship Earth. Without doubt the USian government is in need of such a process in all its branches, as are almost all Earthian governments; but the process is especially needed by the haughty high and mighty I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government dealing with other nations, playing over and over since 1945 second and third-degree versions of the one-up psychological Game NIGYSOB, Now I’ve Got You, You SOB, using Not OK covert psychological sabotages, overt sanctions, military shooting on the ground, and bombing.    

Systems similar to the proposed new Spaceship Earth computer-based system are now up and running on tv news networks. The new zoom technology is taking hold, affecting tv shows and newscasts, and is widely used by various individuals, groups, and organizations. Some tv networks are already doing something similar to what Rout conceived with three or four experts shown on tv screens at once who are zoomed into focus when it’s their time to talk. The new Spaceship Earth, Inc. computer-based system will be able to assimilate and accommodate forty group participants and a group leader positioned around the perimeter of one computer screen, with a virtual reality The Truther pictured in the center of the screen, a spinning rooster that raucously crows when randomly-selecting Leaders of the Moment by pointing them out.  

Thus far no tv network has set up a fully democratic Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK Spaceship Earth-type program with participants randomly-selected from disparate walks of real life who are randomly-selected as Leaders of the Moment in a group to start a democratic discussion of an existential Earthian problem, by defining and discussing a serious problem of the moment in her or his opinion happening anywhere around Spaceship Earth, that includes delineating alternatives for dealing with the problem and making recommendations for doing something about the problem: To help save Spaceship Earth.

After the The Truther randomly-selected Leader of the Moment decides to stop speaking, other group members will discuss the problem the leader brought up agreeing or disagreeing with what the leader said in the order in which they raise their hands until the discussion runs out of steam, at which time The Truther will be spun again if time remains in the session to randomly-select a new Leader of the Moment who will bring up and discuss a new problem. I’m OK—You’re Not OK group members who play filibuster-like psychological Games talking just for sake of talking or to sabotage the development of co-constructed consensual answers will be summarily stopped by a clanging cowbell. Miscreant members of the group will be removed from the screen and permanently banished from the group if they persist with their anti-social behavior.

How to reward participants is an issue. Will Earthian humans participate in such a system for strokes, belonging, structure, stimulation, recognition, personal achievement, and personal satisfaction? Can Earthian humans learn to look upon themselves as equal I’m OK—You’re OK stockholders of Spaceship Earth, Inc., co-constructing with fellow stockholders around Spaceship Earth democratic consensual answers for managing Spaceship Earth states of affairs from the bottom up?

Would Spaceship Earth fraternal chapter discussions be entertaining enough to be shown on tv networks?

Would members of the elite rich such as Harrison in Rout’s The Group learn to accept the computer-based system and the salutary benefits of the I’m OK—You’re OK Adult Game-free discussion process?

They might accept the system if they thought it might eventually lead to all Earthian humans receiving Spaceship Earth, Inc. dividend checks similar to those proposed in the essay, “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”, at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc-3/.

Not all members of Rout’s discussion group or the donor group agreed that The Group had been a success. A sizeable minority of both group members and donors were convinced The Group could not have been formed had the participants not been bribed with money to participate and the seeming OKness increases produced in the group was pseudo OKness that was produced not by genuine structural changes within the psyches of the participants but by Rout’s dictatorial rules and demeanor and his threats to banish participants if they refused to abide by the group’s I’m OK—You’re OK Adult ego state Game-free democratic rules and laws.

According to this view, fundamental laws of cause-effect human nature cannot be changed and as soon as the money is removed the participants of The Group will revert back to their previous levels of OKness or Not OKness. This view assumes humans are inherently mercenary and self-interested and will only do what they perceive will enhance their personal life positions, only doing what they think will do them some good.  Such a view proposes humans from the moment of birth are incessantly goaded into doing what they do by myriad differentiated inexorably progressing infinitely-regressive cause-effect chains in families and in myriad groups and organizations generating differentiated psychological and social script messages, rewards, and punishments that through time create internal psychological feeling, thinking, knowing, believing, and doing structures and programs in individual Earthian humans that never change, barring catastrophic force majeure events.

Rout and a small majority of his group members and donors agree with the proposition that individual Earthian humans are closed systems that cannot change using free will their subconscious feeling, thinking, and behaving structures that have been introjected into, embedded, and ingrained in their brain cells through time; but they also believe—if external states of nature can be changed to some degree by current Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic co-constructed consensual answers—co-constructed by large numbers of Earthian humans from all walks of life correcting Not OK predetermined OKness positions, time structuring patterns, ego states, transactional patterns, Games, Rackets, script messages, and life scripts—Spaceship Earth can be saved. They think there is some chance the new Spaceship Earth Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic Game-free computer-based discussion system widely downloaded in computers around Spaceship Earth by I’m OK—You’re OK fraternal democracy chapters might cause I’m OK—You’re Not OK authoritarian psychological, social, economic, religious, educational, governmental, military, and political forces to change in such a way that human extinction might be prevented.

Some of the observable social OKness increases in The Group were no doubt caused simply by the participants being forced to communicate in Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK ways with humans from disparate walks of life. This in effect changed the state of nature for the participants. Merely having lunch with and shooting the bull with socially unequal group participants before and after group sessions caused many of them to feel more OK about themselves and others. Whether they will revert back to their previous levels of OKness now that the group has been disbanded, making them totally dependent on their naturally-caused friends and family members for strokes, stimulation, recognition, and belonging, remains to be seen.

Rich I’m OK—You’re OK donors in their golden years bored with watching their investment accounts automatically increase by thousands and millions of dollars every year, billions per year in some cases, can donate billions of their surplus dollars to Spaceship Earth, Inc. to hire computer experts to flow chart and write code for the new Spaceship Earth computer-based Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK system; purchase thousands of desktop computers for group members; pay Internet service provider fees; recruit, establish, and administer Spaceship Earth I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free fraternal democracy chapters; and download the new program to millions of computers, to prevent not only the extinction of homo sapiens but also the extinctions of millions of other species of fauna and flora living around Spaceship Earth.   

_______________________________

Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, certified transactional analyst, educator, octogenarian emeritus professor of management, writer, editor and publisher at Effective Learning Company.

If you want to make a comment about this article scroll up to the RESPONSES option atop this article on the masthead of this blog.

REFERENCES

Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American psychologist. Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 715-729.

Abercrombie, M.L.J. (1960). The anatomy of judgment: An investigation into the processes of perception and reasoning. Basic Books: New York.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (1988). Scripts and permissions: Some unexamined assumptions and connotations. Transactional analysis journal, 18, 283-293.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (1991). Towards a constructivist TA. In B.R. Loria (Ed.), The stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference, pp. 1-22. Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Allen, J.R. (2003). Concepts, competencies, and interpretative communities. Transactional analysis journal, 33(2),126-147.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (2005). Therapeutic journey: Life and practice. Oakland, CA: Transactional Analysis Press.

Anderson, R.C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference, in Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Anderson, R.C., Spiro, W.E., and Montague, W.E., (eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Baier, Kurt (1958). The moral point of view: A rational basis of ethics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Barnes, G., ed. (1977). Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools. New York: Harper’s College Press.

Barnes, G. (1994). Justice, love, and wisdom: Linking psychotherapy to second-order cybernetics. Zabreb, Croatia: Medicinska Naklada.

Bateson, Gregory. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: The new information sciences can lead to a new understanding of man. New York: Ballantine Books. 729

Bedeian, A (2002). The dean’s disease: How the darker side of power manifests itself in the office of the dean. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1 (2), 164-173.

Belmont, J.M. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learning. American psychologist, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 142-148.

Bennett, J.B. (1971). Good writing. Boston, MA: Intercollegiate Case Clearing House, Harvard College.

Berne, Eric (1957). Ego states in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 11:2.

Berne, Eric (1957). A layman’s guide to psychiatry and psychoanalysis. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Berne, Eric (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York: Grove Press.

Berne, E. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove Press.

Berne, E. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York: Grove Press. Berne, Eric. (1970) What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. New York: Grove Press.

Bierman, H., Bonini, C.; and Hauseman, W. (1969). Quantitative analysis for business decisions. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Bird, B.J. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Glenview, IL: Scot, Foresman and Company.

Bienvenu, B. (1969). New priorities in training: A guide for industry. New York: American Management Association.

Brandt, S.C. (1989). Foreword. New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J., and Grousbeck, H.I. Homewood, Ill: Irwin.

Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith.New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Buber, M. (1966). The way of response. N.N. Glatzer, (ed.), New York: Schocken Books.

Buber, M. (1969). Genuine dialogue and the possibilities of peace (M. Friedman, trans.). In E.W. Williams & H. Zahn (Eds.), Men of dialogue: Martin Buber and Albrecht Goes (pp. 20-27), New York: Funk & Wagnalls. (Original work published 1957).

Carland, J.C., Carland, J.W. and Stewart, W. (1996). Seeing what’s not there: The enigma of entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the 20th National Small Business Consulting Conference, San Diego, CA., pp. 3-8.

Carlson, R. (1981). Studies in script theory: Adult analogs of a childhood nuclear scene. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 501-510.

Carter, J. (2006). Palestine: Peace not apartheid. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Cates, J.N. and Sussman, M.B. (1992). Family systems and inheritance. Family business review, Vol. V, No. 2, pp. 205-226

Chacko, T.I. (1983). Student ratings of instruction: A function of grading standards. Eductional Research Quarterly, 8 (2), 20-25.

Childs-Gowell, E. (1979). Bodyscript Blockbusting. Seattle, Washington.

Childs-Gowell, E. (1992). Good Grief Rituals. Station Hill Press. Childs-Gowell, E. (2001). Regression and protection: How to provide safety when working with deeply wounded clients. Seattle, Washington.

Christensen, C.R. and Hanson, A.J. (1986). Teaching and the case method. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

Christensen, C.R., Garvin, D.A., & Sweet, A. (Eds.). (1991).Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C.R. (1992). Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

Chomsky, N. (1987). The chomsky reader, J. Peck, ed. New York: Pantheon books.

Chomsky, N. (2005). Imperial ambitions: Conversations on the post-9/11 world, interviews with David Barsamian. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Clarke, J.I. and Dawson, C. (1998). Growing up again: Parenting ourselves, parenting our children. Center City: Minn.: Hazelden, 1998. Clarke, J.L. (1999). Connections: The threads that strengthen families. Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden.

Cockburn, A. (2007, May 14). Is global warming a sin? The Nation, Vol 284, No. 19.

Cohen, A.R, Fink, S, Gadon, H. & Willits, R. (1992). Effective behavior in organizations: Learning from the interplay of cases, concepts, and student experiences (5th ed.). Homewood, Ill: Irwin.

Cohn, M. (1990). Passing the torch: Transfer strategies for your family business. US: Liberty Hall Press.

Collins, O. and Moore, D. (1970). The organization makers: A behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs. New York: Appleton- Crofts.

Collins, J.C. & Lazier, W.C. (1995). Managing the small to mid-sized company. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Cooper, M. (2007, Sept. 10/17). GOP clutches at Iowa straws: The party’s burdened by an unpopular war. The Nation, Vol. 285, No. 7.

Cornell, W.F. (1988). Life script theory: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 270-282.

Cox, William John. (2004). You’re not stupid! Get the truth: A brief on the Bush Presidency. Joshua Tree, CA: Progressive Press.

Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species: By means of natural selection or The preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. Reprinted 1998. New York: The Modern Library.

Dawkins, R. (2004). The ancestor’s tale: A pilgrimage to the dawn of evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Dennis, W. J. (1993). A small business primer. Washington, D.C.: National Federation of Independent Business.

Dennis, W.J. (2000). NFIB Small Business Policy Guide. Washington, D.C.: National Federation of Independent Business.

Dewey, John. (1935). Democracy in education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.

de Young, J. (1991). Cases in small business management: A strategic problems approach. Dover, New Hampshire: Upstart Publishing Company, Inc.

Doherty, W.J. (1997). The intentional family: How to build family ties in our modern world. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Dooley, A.R., & Skinner, W. (1977, April). Casing case method methods. Academy of Management Review, 2(2).

Drego, Pearl (2005). Acceptance speech on receiving the 2004 Eric Berne Memorial Award at Edinburgh, Scotland. Transactional analysis journal. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 7-30.

Diamond, J. (2006). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.

Dressel,P.L.(1961).Evaluation in higher education. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.

Dusay, J. (1972). Egograms and the constancy hypothesis. Transactional Analysis Journal. 2(3), 37-41.

Eagle Executive (2006). University impacts region by more than $650 million. Jim Davis, editor, Vol. 20, No. 1, pg 12. Statesboro, GA: College of Business Administration, Georgia Southern University.

Eckblad, G. (1981). Scheme theory: A conceptual framework for cognitive-motivational processes. London: Academic Press.

Egan, T. (2006). The worst hard time: The untold story of those who survived the great American dust bowl. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

English, F. (1971). The substitution factor: Rackets and real feelings, Part I,” Transactional Analysis Journal. 1(4), 27-32.

English, F. (1972). Rackets and real feelings, Part II. Transactional Analysis Journal. 2(1), 23-25.

English, F. (1988). Whither scripts? Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 292-303.

Ernst, F. (1971). The OK corral: The grid for get on with. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1971, 1(4), 231-240

Ernst, K (1972). Games students play, and what to do about them. Millbrae, CA: Celestial Arts Publishing,.

Erskine, R. and Moursund, J. (1988). Integrative psychotherapy in action. Highland, New York: The Gestalt Journal Press, Inc.

Fischer, Judith, D. (2004). The use and effects of student ratings in legal writing courses: A plea for holistic evaluation of teaching. Legal writing: The journal of the legal writing institute, Volume 10.

Fontaine, James (1838). A Tale of the Huguenots or Memoirs of a French Refugee Family, Translated and Compiled from the Original Manuscripts of James Fontaine by One of His Descendants, with an Introduction by F.J. Hawkes, D.D.,stithvalley.com/fontaine/ memoirsj.htm. The manuscript was first published by John S. Taylor, Theological and Sunday School Bookseller, Corner of Park Row and Spruce Street, New York, 1838.

Forbes (2003). B-Schools: The payback. Forbes magazine, October 13, 2003, 172(8), 72-74.

Freire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Freud, S. (1933). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. James Strachey (Trans. and Ed.), 1965. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1966.

Fuller, R.B. (1969). Operating manual for spaceship earth. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Gagne, R.M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd. ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gellert, S.A. (1983). Nuts come in pairs: All you ever wanted to know about couples’ relationships and were afraid to ask. New York: Cite Press.

Gilligan, James (1997). Violence: Reflections on a national epidemic. New York: Random House.

Ginsberg, Eli (1966). The development of human resources. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Gioia, D.A. and Poole, P.P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 449-459.

Giroux, Henry. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

Goldman, A.L. (1970). A theory of human action. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Gore, A. (2007). The assault on reason. New York: The Penguin Press.

Goulding, R. and Goulding, M. (1976). Injunctions, decisions, and redecisions. Transactional Analysis Journal, 6(1), 41-48.

Gragg, C.I. (1940). Because wisdom can’t be told. Originally published in the Harvard Magazine. In R. Stapleton (ed.), The Entrepreneur: Concepts and Cases on Creativity in Business. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1985.

Graham, Benjamin (1973). The Intelligent Investor. New copyrighted material added by Jason Zweig, 2003. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997a). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52 (11), 1209-1216.

Greenwald, A.G. & Gillmore, G.M. (1997b). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (4), 743-751.

Groder, M. (1977). Groder’s 5 OK diagrams. In G. Barnes (ed.), Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools. New York: Harper’s College Press.

Groder, M. (1980). Business games: How to recognize the players and deal with them, New York: Boardroom Books.

Groder, M. (1996). The fractionated nature of human nature. Presentation at the Annual meeting of the International Transactional Analysis Association, August, 1996, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.

Haskell, R.E. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluation of teachers: Galloping polls in the 21st century. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 5(6).

Harris, S. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Harris, T. (1967). I’m OK—You’re OK: A practical guide to transactional analysis. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

Hastorf, A.H. and Isen, A.M. (1982). Cognitive social psychology. New York: Elsevier North Holland, Inc.

Healy, P. (2001). Harvard’s quiet secret: Rampant grade inflation. The Boston Globe, October 7, 2001.

Hearn, C.G. (2002). Tracks in the sea: Matthew Fontaine Maury and the mapping of the oceans. Crawfordsville, IN: R. R. Donnelly.

Heathcote, A. (2006). Applying transactional analysis to the understanding of narcissism. Transactional analysis journal, 36(3), 228-234.

Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.

Hightower, J. (2003). Thieves in high places: They’ve stolen our country and it’s time to take it back. Viking: New York.

Hine, Jenni (2005). Brain structures and ego states. Transactional analysis journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 40-51.

Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan. J.C.A. Gaskin, Ed. (USA: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Hume, David (1738) A treatise of human nature, Vol.I. London, J.M. Dent & Sons and in New York by E.P. Dutton & Co.

ITAA (1998). Membership Directory of the International Transactional Analysis Association. San Francisco, CA.

Hosmer, L.T., Cooper, A.C., & Vesper, K.H. (1977). The entrepreneurial function: Text and cases on smaller firms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jackson, P.W. (1977). Comments on CHAPTER 11 by Berliner and Rosenshine, in Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Anderson, R.C., Spiro, W.E., and Montague, W.E., (eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Jacobs, A. (1991). Aspects of Survival: Triumph over death and onliness. Transactional Analysis Journal. 21(1). 4-11.

Jaffe, D.T. (1990). Working with the ones you love: Conflict resolution and problem solving strategies for a successful family business. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.

James, Muriel and Jongeward, D. (1973). Born to win: Transactional analysis with gestalt experiments, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

James, M. (1974). Self Reparenting: Application to Script Analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(3) 32-39.

James, M. (1975). The OK Boss. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Jongeward, D. (1973). Everybody wins: Transactional analysis applied to organizations. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (1999). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Johnson, V.E. (2002). An A is an A is an A . . . and that’s the problem. New York Times, Section 4A, Page 14, Column 1.

Joines, V. and Stewart, I. (1987). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham and Chapel Hill: Lifespace Publishing.

Kahler, Taibi and Capers, Hedges (1974). The Miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(1), 26-42.

Kant, Immanuel (1781) Critique of pure reason, second ed 1787, first published 1781, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Macmilan & Co Ltd; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1963

Kao, J. (1989). Entrepreneurship, creativity, & organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis, Transactional Analysis Bulletin. 7(26), 39-43.

Karpman, S. (1975). The bias box for competing psychotherapies. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5, 107-116.

Keynes, J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1991.

Lankton, S.R. (1980). Practical magic: A translation of basic neuro-linguistic programming into clinical psychology. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications.

Lea, J.W. (1991). Keeping it in the Family. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory and the brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50-57.

LeDoux. J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone Books.

LeDoux, J. (2002). Synaptic Self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Penguin Putnam.

Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Lord, R.G. and Kernan, M.C. (1987). Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations. Academy of management review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 265-277.

Loria, B.R. (1991). Integrative family therapy: A constructivist perspective. In B.R. Loria (Ed.) The stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference (pp. 34-41). Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Kauffman. S.A. (1993). The origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Malthus, Thomas (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J.Johnson.

Marx, Karl (1867). Das kapital: A critique of political economy. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston: New Science Library.

Maury, D.H. (1894). Recollections of a Virginian in the Mexican, Indian, and Civil Wars. NewYork: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Maury, M.F. (1836). A new theoretical and practical treatise on navigation. Philadelphia: Key and Biddle.

Maury, M.F. (1855). Physical geography of the seas. New York: Harper & Brothers. Now available from amazon.com as The physical geography of the seas and its meteorology. Dover Publications, 2003.

McCulloch, W.S. (1988). Embodiments of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.

McKenna, J. (1974). Stroking profile: Applications to script analysis, Transactional Analysis Journal, 4(4), 20-24.

Mieczkowski, B. (1991). Dysfunctional bureaucracy: A comparative and historical perspective. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Mieczkowski, B. (1995). The rot at the top: Dysfunctional bureaucracy in academia. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Moore, M. (2001). Stupid white men and other sorry excuses for the state of the nation! New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W.H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco.

Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall, Inc.

Novey, Theodore (2002). Measuring the effectiveness of transactional analysis: An international study. Transactional Analysis Journal, 32: 1, pp. 8-25.

Osnes, R. (1974). Spot Reparenting. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(3), 40-46.

Osnes, R. and Gesme, C. (2000). Life is a celebration. Edina, Minnesota: Beaver’s Creek Press.

Pascal, B. (1669). The Pensees (thoughts). A defense of the Christian religion by Blaise Pascal, a renowed 17th century philosopher and mathematician. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. En.wikipedia. org/wiki/Pensees.

Perls, F. S. (1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. Moab, Utah: The Real People Press.

Perls, F. (1969). In and out of the garbage pail. Moab, Utah: The Real People Press.

Piaget, J. (1971). The grasp of consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Popper, K.R. and Eccles, J.C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin/ New York/London: Springer International.

Powers, R. (2006). Mark Twain: A Life. New York: Free Press.

Prince, G.M. (1970). The practice of creativity: A manual for dynamic group problem solving. New York: Collier Books.

Random House Dictionary of the English Language. (1967). Stein, Jess, Urdang, and Laurence, editors, New York: Random House.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Ronstadt, R.C. (1985). Entrepreneurship: Text, cases, and notes. Dover, MA: Lord Publishing Company.

Russell, B. and North, A.N. (1910, 1912, 1913). Principia Mathematica, 3 Vols. Cambridge: At the University Press. Russell, B. (1959). My philosophical development. London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: Simon and Schuster.

Russell, B. (1967, 1968, 1969). The autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 3 vols. London: George Allen and Unwin; Boston and Toronto: Little Brown and Company (Vols 1 and 2); New York: Simon and Schuster (Vol. 3).

Schiff, A. L. and Schiff, J. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(1), 71-78.

Schrage, Harry. (1965). The R & D Entrepreneur: Profile of Success. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, Nov.-Dec., p. 56.

Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1951). Imperialism and social classes. New York: A.M. Kelly, Oxford, Blackwell.

Simon, H.A. (1957). Administrative behavior (1st ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision- making processes in administrative organizational (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, reprinted as The Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library, Inc., 1937).

Soros, G. (2006). The age of fallibility: Consequences of the war on terror. New York: Public Affairs.

Statesboro Herald (2006, September 18). Chambliss observes effects of global warming: Recent trip to Greenland gives New Perspective. Statesboro, GA: Statesboro Publishing Company, p. 1.

Stapleton, R.J. (1970). An analysis of rural manpower migration patterns in the South Plains region of Texas. (Doctoral dissertation). Washington, DC: Department of Labor, Office of Manpower Evaluation and Research, National Technical Information Service (PB188048). file:///Users/richardstapleton/Downloads/31295004728316-2.pdf

Stapleton, R.J. (1976). Managing creatively: Action learning in action. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

Stapleton, R.J. (1978). The chain of ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal. 8(3), 215-219.

Stapleton, R.J. (1979a, April). The classroom de-gamer. Transactional Analysis Journal. 9(2), 145-146.

Stapleton, R.J (1979b). De-gaming teaching and learning: How to motivate learners and invite Okness. Statesboro, GA: Effective Learning Publications.

Stapleton, R.J. (1984). Implications of small business prospectuses developed by business students. In D. Ray (Ed.) Proceeedings of the 1984 Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, pp. 228-230.

Stapleton, R.J. (1985). The entrepreneur: Concepts and cases on creativity in business. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Stapleton, R.J., & Murkison, G. (1988, October). Entrepreneurial learning and small business failure rates. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting, The Institute of Management Sciences Southeastern CHAPTER, Myrtle Beach, SC.

Stapleton, R.J. (1989-1990). Academic entrepreneurship: Using the case method to simulate competitive business markets. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. Vol. XIV, No. IV, pp. 88-104.

Stapleton, R.J. and Murkison, G. (1990). Scripts and entrepreneurship. Transactional Analysis Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, July, pp. 193-197.

Stapleton, R.J. (1991). Game-freer teaching and learning; How to increase intellectual productivity in schools by decreasing psychological games. In B.R. Loria (Ed.) The Stamford Papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference, pp. 250-267. Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1993). Feedback regarding a game-free case method process used to educate general management and entrepreneurship students. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Southeast CHAPTER of the Institute for Management Science. Myrtle Beach, SC, October, 1993

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1994). Realistically estimating the magnitude and significance of business learning: Longitudinal feedback regarding a management learning process. Manuscript. Georgia Southern University.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (1996). Randomly selecting students to lead case method discussions: Problems and pitfalls in performance appraisal. Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Meeting of SE INFORMS, Myrtle Beach, SC, October, 1996. This paper won the Best Paper Award for the Education Innovation Track at the conference.

Stapleton, R.J. and Price, B. (1997). Fall Quarter Student Evaluation Research Findings. Manuscript. Department of Management, Georgia Southern University.

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1997). The significance of schemata and scripts in entrepreneurship education and development. In T.G. Monroy, J. Reichert, F. Hoy, & K. Williams (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship education: Volume IV (pp, 89-104). Akron, OH: The Project for excellence in Entrepreneurship Education.

Stapleton, R. J. (1998). Business Voyages: Mental maps, scripts, schemata, and tools for finding and co-constructing your own business worlds. Monograph. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern Printing Services.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (1998). Teaching business using the case method and transactional analysis: A constructivist approach. Transactional Analysis Journal, 28(2), 157-167.

Stapleton, R. J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2001). Basic policies affecting the longevity of family businesses. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern CHAPTER of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

Stapleton, R.J. and Murkison, G. (2001). Optimizing the fairness of student evaluations: A study of correlations between instructor excellence, study production, learning production, and expected grades. The journal of management education, 25(3), 269-292.

Optimizing the Fairness of Student Evaluations by now (April 5, 2021) has been cited as a reference in 75 refereed journal articles in most academic disciplines. https://studysites.sagepub.com/holt/articles/Stapleton.pdf

Stapleton, R. J. and Stapleton, D. C. (2002). Attitudes of family business owners regarding policies for transferring the wealth of family businesses, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference, Small Business Institute Directors Association, February, San Diego, CA, pp. 172-177.

Stapleton, R.J. (2003). Georgia southern entrepreneurship: Activities, contributors, cases (4th ed.). Monograph. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern Printing Services.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2003a). The truth of student evaluations. Manuscript.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2003b). The morality of university grading. Manuscript.

Stapleton, R.J., Stapleton, D.C., & Tomlinson, M. (2004). Factors in family business planning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Small Business Institute Director’s Association. Clearwater Beach, FL, February. This article has been reprinted in several publications, including The Script, a publication of the International Transactional Analysis Association.

Stapleton, R.J. (2008)  Business Voyages: Mental Maps, Scripts, Schemata, and Tools for Discovering and Co-Constructing Your Own Business Worlds, Statesboro, Georgia: Effective Learning Publications, Amazon.com., 712 pages. https://www.amazon.com/Business-Voyages-Schemata-Discovering-Co-Constructing/dp/1413480810  

Stapleton, R.J. (2012) Recommendations for Waking Up From the American Nightmare, an eBook, Amazon.com., 253 pages. https://www.amazon.com/Recommendations-American-Nightmare-Business-Voyages-ebook/dp/B009TOJVPI

Stapleton, R.J. (2016) Born to Learn: A Transactional Analysis of Human Learning, Statesboro, Georgia: Effective Learning Publications, https://www.amazon.com/Born-Learn-Transactional-Analysis-Learning/dp/0692584331/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1510510282&sr=8-1&keywords=born+to+learn++++richard+john+stapleton&dpID=414yiE-4%252BIL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch

Stapleton, R.J. (2020) “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”, Statesboro, GA: Effective Learning Publications, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc-3/

Stevenson, H., Roberts, M., & Grousbeck, H. (1994). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Burr Ridge, Ill.: Irwin.

Stevenson, H.H.; Grousbeck, H.I.; Roberts, M.J.; and Bhide, A. (1999). New business ventures and the entrepreneur (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Steiner, C. (1971). The stroke economy. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1(3), 9-15.

Steiner, C. (1974). Scripts people live: Transactional analysis of life scripts. New York: Grove Press.

Steiner, C. M. (2003). Letter from the guest coeditor. Transactional Analysis Journal. 33(2), 111-114.

Stewart, I. and Joines, V. (1987). TA Today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham and Chapel Hill: Lifespace Publishing.

The Economist (2001, April 12). All shall have prizes. London: Economist.com.

The Economist (2002, October 5). Who’s been cheating? Exams are about sorting the bright from the dim, not about demonstrating progress, 365(8293).

The Economist (2006, September 15-19). The heat is on: A special report on climate change. London, 380(8494).

Thompson, A.A., & Strickland, A.J. (1987). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.

Thompson, A. & Strickland, A. (1995). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Chicago, Ill.: Irwin.

Thompson, A.A. & Strickland, A.J. (2003). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (13th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Thorndyke, P.W. and Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Cognitive psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 82-106.

Timmons, Jeffrey A. (1994). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century. Burr Ridge, ILL: IRWIN

Tocqueville, A. de (1835). Democracy in America. H. Reeve, trans., P. Bradley, ed., Everyman’s Library, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.

Towl, A.R. (1969). To study administration by cases. Boston: Harvard University Press.

USAToday (2007, February 21). Pension tension: More and more retirees are finding it pays to have worked for the government instead of the private sector. McLean, VA; Gannett Company, Inc., p. 2A

Veblen, T. (1902). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

Vesper, Karl H. (1996). New venture experience: Text, exercises, cases. Seattle, WA: Vector Books.

Von Foerster, Heinz (1984). “On constructing a reality”, in The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know. Paul Watzlawick (Ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Von Glaserfeld, E. (1988). The construction of knowledge: Contribution to conceptual semantics. Salinas, CA: Intersystems Publications.

Wagner, Abe (1991). Say it Straight or You’ll Show it Crooked. Denver, Colorado: Abe Wagner and Associates.

Walsh, D. (1985). Selling out America’s children. Minneapolis: Fairview Press, 1994.

Ward, P.D. (2006, October). Impact from the deep: Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions. Scientific American, Vol. 295, No. 4, pp. 65-71.

Watzlawick, P. (1984). The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know?: Contributions to constructivism. (P. Watzlawick, ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Weiner, J. (1995). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. First published in 1953.

Wittgenstein, L. (1971), Prototractatus, an early version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, edited by B.F. McGuinness, T. Nyberg, and G.H. von Wright, with a translation by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness with an historical introduction by G.H. von Wright and a facsimile of the author’s manuscript. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. First published in 1921.

Wood, J.D. and Petriglieri, G. (2005). Transcending polarization: Beyond binary thinking. Transactional analysis journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 31-39.

                  APPENDIXES

Rout Logger’s Creator’s Genetic, Psychological, and Social Inheritance https://blog.effectivelearning.net/stapleton-genealogy/embed/#?secret=3ExRNLSeF7

Rout Logger’s Creator’s Resume https://blog.effectivelearning.net/rjs-academic-vita/embed/#?secret=w66eRuLr0H

ROUT LOGGER’S GROUP: TO SAVE SPACESHIP EARTH — Internet Episode 8

By RICHARD JOHN STAPLETON

Rout Logger’s Group: To Save Spaceship Earth is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered to the public.

Copyright 2020 by Effective Learning Publications. All rights reserved. No part of this Internet novel may be copied or printed on paper without permission. Share on the Internet as you wish.

To refresh yourself about what happened in earlier episodes, go to the following website addresses:

Internet Episode 1, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-part-1/.   

Internet Episode 2, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-2/.

Internet Episode 3, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-three/.

Internet Episode 4, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-four/.

Internet Episode 5, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-five/.

Internet Episode 6,  https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-six/  

Internet Episode 7, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/rout-loggers-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-7/

A list of names of forty cast members with a short biographical blurb about each is presented in Internet Episode 1.

INTERNET EPISODE EIGHT

Group members were not surprised that Rout decided to cancel The Group meetings because of the Covid pandemic.

They had no desire to go to monthly meetings requiring air travel exposing them to the Corona virus in airports, airplanes, hotels, and restaurants; but most were surprised that Rout decided to discontinue The Group permanently. They thought he would start it back up after the Corona problem went away. They were also surprised he gave them another five thousand dollars in severance pay in July 2020. They had not been paid for cancelled meetings in the months of April, May, and June of 2020.

Rout and the donors seriously considered using some sort of zoom process with the members working from home in group meetings, but they decided this was not worth pursuing at this time using available technology.

The group members were disappointed things turned out as they did and felt a sense of loss. While some criticized and resented Rout’s rules, arbitrary decisions, and stern uncaring demeanor they had found the overall experience to be satisfying, and they knew they had been well compensated for their time and participation.

The strangeness of the process in the first two meetings caused Not-OKness to increase in most group members, but as the months rolled by the members began to experience increased OKness and satisfaction. Those entering the process with I’m Not OK—You’re OK; I’m Not-OK—You’re Not OK; and I’m OK—You’re Not OK life positions by the end of the last session generally spent more time in the I’m OK—You’re OK winner quadrant of the OK Corral, the upper right quadrant of a mathematical space encompassing two axes crossing at zero in the center of the space, with negative and positive OKness estimated west and east of origin on the horizontal axis and positive and negative OKness estimated north and south of origin, with I being the vertical axis and You being the horizontal axis. Intersecting I and You positive or negative OKness combinations for specific individuals existed at points in all four quadrants of the OK Corral.

OKness cannot be precisely measured, but it can be estimated by observing others and by self-evaluation. Most humans if they think about it know if they are OK or Not OK at any moment. How OK is another matter. OK relative to what? Relative to how OK one was yesterday, or six months ago? And how OK about what? Yes, estimating OKness has to be a subjective judgement call, but it can be done. It also can be done estimating how OK someone else is. Most humans can see and hear by observation when someone is OK or Not OK.

There are two basic types of OKness: Psychological and Social.

Social OKness is generally talked about.

Psychological OKness is generally not talked about.

In many cases humans are socially OK but psychologically abysmal.

Social OKness is based on fact relative to standards concerned with whether and to what degree goals, objectives, and missions have been achieved, such as whether someone has adequate food, clothing, and shelter. If someone is hungry, cold, and miserable it’s an objective fact s/he is Not OK. If someone is in acute physical pain caused by an accident, malnutrition, or disease s/he is Not OK. The same is true for individuals who cannot function in society because of emotional, mental, and behavioral disorders caused by traumatic genetic and social inheritances.  

Psychological OKness is a judgmental subjective opinion an individual holds regarding her/himself and others not based on objective data and information that is concerned with focal points such as sex, gender, race, overall appearance, behavioral traits, personality traits, intelligence, knowledge, beliefs, abilities, and worthiness.     

Rout’s group members were all socially OK in the sense they were all functioning members of society and were getting their needs met at levels that provided OK levels of satisfaction, not great levels of satisfaction necessarily but OK levels. On the other hand, they all had life positions with respect to some humans that were non-I’m OK—You’re OK: regarding such things as races, sexual orientations, religions, abortions, economic classes, social classes, professions, and political parties. The members were unequally OK regarding all issues.

The members learned in Rout’s group how to transact with one another socially using I’m OK—You’re OK and Adult ego states and how not to play psychological Games; but their psychological structural programming and scripting was left largely intact. Some increases in psychological OKness probably happened over the course of the six monthly meetings; but significantly changing psychological structural programming for most people would probably take years of group sessions and more intimate discussions than what happened in Rout’s group.

Rout was surprised however at how quickly the group adapted to increase social OKness, proving in his mind and in the minds of a majority of his donor group that the random-selection democratic process used with humans from disparate walks of life has merit and would produce positive social results around Earth if it were widely used. He and the group donors decided this result was good enough to call The Group experiment a success, so they decided to disband the group permanently, deciding to focus instead on developing software for a new computer-based democratic Adult I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free system, in a new non-profit corporation Spaceship Earth, Inc., to change dysfunctional social level transactions around Spaceship Earth as soon and widely as possible, to encourage and foster liberty, equality, and fraternity.

Ideally the new computer-based Adult ego state Game-free system and fraternal democracy chapters will take root and evolve in usage around Spaceship Earth to produce results analogous to those produced by The Group, eventually evolving group participation by many millions of Earthian humans. What is the probability this will happen? Probably less than .25, but Rout and a majority of his donors thought the goal was worth pursuing. All the donors have a lot of money and they were glad to wager some of it on something that might produce truly significant social results for all Earthian humans. Some of the donors had already tried to no avail to get the I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government to increase their income taxes to provide money for infrastructure projects to help lower-class and middle-class USian citizens; but this was prevented by I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian presidents and congress people who were financed by I’m OK—You’re Not OK elite rich citizens and large corporations (primarily repugnant Repugs but also dim Dems) who did not want their income taxes increased.

One donor thought the new proposed computer-based I’m OK—You’re OK democratic sortition discussion system might become the social equivalent of a Salk vaccine to prevent violence around Spaceship Earth. Without doubt the USian government is in need of such a process in all its branches, as are almost all Earthian governments; but the process is especially needed by the haughty high and mighty I’m OK—You’re Not OK USian government dealing with other nations, playing over and over since 1945 second and third-degree versions of the one-up psychological Game NIGYSOB, Now I’ve Got You, You SOB, using Not OK covert psychological sabotages, overt sanctions, military shooting on the ground, and bombing.    

Systems similar to the proposed new Spaceship Earth computer-based system are now up and running on tv news networks. The new zoom technology is taking hold, affecting tv shows and newscasts, and is widely used by various individuals, groups, and organizations. Some tv networks are already doing something similar to what Rout conceived with three or four experts shown on tv screens at once who are zoomed into focus when it’s their time to talk. The new Spaceship Earth, Inc. computer-based system will be able to assimilate and accommodate forty group participants and a group leader positioned around the perimeter of one computer screen, with a virtual reality The Truther pictured in the center of the screen, a spinning rooster that raucously crows when randomly-selecting Leaders of the Moment by pointing them out.  

Thus far no tv network has set up a fully democratic Game-free I’m OK—You’re OK Spaceship Earth-type program with participants randomly-selected from disparate walks of real life who are randomly-selected as Leaders of the Moment in a group to start a democratic discussion of an existential Earthian problem, by defining and discussing a serious problem of the moment in her or his opinion happening anywhere around Spaceship Earth, that includes delineating alternatives for dealing with the problem and making recommendations for doing something about the problem: To help save Spaceship Earth.

After the The Truther randomly-selected Leader of the Moment decides to stop speaking, other group members will discuss the problem the leader brought up agreeing or disagreeing with what the leader said in the order in which they raise their hands until the discussion runs out of steam, at which time The Truther will be spun again if time remains in the session to randomly-select a new Leader of the Moment who will bring up and discuss a new problem. I’m OK—You’re Not OK group members who play filibuster-like psychological Games talking just for sake of talking or to sabotage the development of co-constructed consensual answers will be summarily stopped by a clanging cowbell. Miscreant members of the group will be removed from the screen and permanently banished from the group if they persist with their anti-social behavior.

How to reward participants is an issue. Will Earthian humans participate in such a system for strokes, belonging, structure, stimulation, recognition, personal achievement, and personal satisfaction? Can Earthian humans learn to look upon themselves as equal I’m OK—You’re OK stockholders of Spaceship Earth, Inc., co-constructing with fellow stockholders around Spaceship Earth democratic consensual answers for managing Spaceship Earth states of affairs from the bottom up?

Would Spaceship Earth fraternal chapter discussions be entertaining enough to be shown on tv networks?

Would members of the elite rich such as Harrison in Rout’s The Group learn to accept the computer-based system and the salutary benefits of the I’m OK—You’re OK Adult Game-free discussion process?

They might accept the system if they thought it might eventually lead to all Earthian humans receiving Spaceship Earth, Inc. dividend checks similar to those proposed in the essay, “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”, at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc-3/.

Not all members of Rout’s discussion group or the donor group agreed that The Group had been a success. A sizeable minority of both group members and donors were convinced The Group could not have been formed had the participants not been bribed with money to participate and the seeming OKness increases produced in the group was pseudo OKness that was produced not by genuine structural changes within the psyches of the participants but by Rout’s dictatorial rules and demeanor and his threats to banish participants if they refused to abide by the group’s I’m OK—You’re OK Adult ego state Game-free democratic rules and laws.

According to this view, fundamental laws of cause-effect human nature cannot be changed and as soon as the money is removed the participants of The Group will revert back to their previous levels of OKness or Not OKness. This view assumes humans are inherently mercenary and self-interested and will only do what they perceive will enhance their personal life positions, only doing what they think will do them some good.  Such a view proposes humans from the moment of birth are incessantly goaded into doing what they do by myriad differentiated inexorably progressing infinitely-regressive cause-effect chains in families and in myriad groups and organizations generating differentiated psychological and social script messages, rewards, and punishments that through time create internal psychological feeling, thinking, knowing, believing, and doing structures and programs in individual Earthian humans that never change, barring catastrophic force majeure events.

Rout and a small majority of his group members and donors agree with the proposition that individual Earthian humans are closed systems that cannot change using free will their subconscious feeling, thinking, and behaving structures that have been introjected into, embedded, and ingrained in their brain cells through time; but they also believe—if external states of nature can be changed to some degree by current Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic co-constructed consensual answers—co-constructed by large numbers of Earthian humans from all walks of life correcting Not OK predetermined OKness positions, time structuring patterns, ego states, transactional patterns, Games, Rackets, script messages, and life scripts—Spaceship Earth can be saved. They think there is some chance the new Spaceship Earth Adult I’m OK—You’re OK democratic Game-free computer-based discussion system widely downloaded in computers around Spaceship Earth by I’m OK—You’re OK fraternal democracy chapters might cause I’m OK—You’re Not OK authoritarian psychological, social, economic, religious, educational, governmental, military, and political forces to change in such a way that human extinction might be prevented.

Rich I’m OK—You’re OK donors in their golden years bored with watching their investment accounts automatically increase by thousands and millions of dollars every year, billions per year in some cases, can donate billions of their surplus dollars to Spaceship Earth, Inc. to hire experts in the field to flow chart and write code for the new Spaceship Earth computer-based system; purchase thousands of desktop computers for group members; pay Internet service provider fees; recruit, establish, and administer Spaceship Earth I’m OK—You’re OK Game-free fraternal democracy chapters; and download the new program to millions of computers, to prevent not only the extinction of homo sapiens but also the extinctions of millions of other species of fauna and flora around Spaceship Earth.   

_______________________________

Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, certified transactional analyst, educator, octogenarian emeritus professor of management, writer, editor and publisher at Effective Learning Company.

If you want to make a comment about this article scroll up to the RESPONSES option atop this article on the masthead of this blog.

REFERENCES

Abelson, R.P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American psychologist. Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 715-729.

Abercrombie, M.L.J. (1960). The anatomy of judgment: An investigation into the processes of perception and reasoning. Basic Books: New York.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (1988). Scripts and permissions: Some unexamined assumptions and connotations. Transactional analysis journal, 18, 283-293.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (1991). Towards a constructivist TA. In B.R. Loria (Ed.), The stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference, pp. 1-22. Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Allen, J.R. (2003). Concepts, competencies, and interpretative communities. Transactional analysis journal, 33(2),126-147.

Allen, J.R. and Allen, B.A. (2005). Therapeutic journey: Life and practice. Oakland, CA: Transactional Analysis Press.

Anderson, R.C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference, in Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Anderson, R.C., Spiro, W.E., and Montague, W.E., (eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Baier, Kurt (1958). The moral point of view: A rational basis of ethics. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.

Barnes, G., ed. (1977). Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools. New York: Harper’s College Press.

Barnes, G. (1994). Justice, love, and wisdom: Linking psychotherapy to second-order cybernetics. Zabreb, Croatia: Medicinska Naklada.

Bateson, Gregory. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: The new information sciences can lead to a new understanding of man. New York: Ballantine Books. 729

Bedeian, A (2002). The dean’s disease: How the darker side of power manifests itself in the office of the dean. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1 (2), 164-173.

Belmont, J.M. (1989). Cognitive strategies and strategic learning. American psychologist, Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 142-148.

Bennett, J.B. (1971). Good writing. Boston, MA: Intercollegiate Case Clearing House, Harvard College.

Berne, Eric (1957). Ego states in psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 11:2.

Berne, Eric (1957). A layman’s guide to psychiatry and psychoanalysis. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Berne, Eric (1963). The structure and dynamics of organizations and groups. New York: Grove Press.

Berne, E. (1964). Games people play: The psychology of human relationships. New York: Grove Press.

Berne, E. (1966). Principles of group treatment. New York: Grove Press. Berne, Eric. (1970) What do you say after you say hello? The psychology of human destiny. New York: Grove Press.

Bierman, H., Bonini, C.; and Hauseman, W. (1969). Quantitative analysis for business decisions. Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. Bird, B.J. (1989). Entrepreneurial behavior. Glenview, IL: Scot, Foresman and Company.

Bienvenu, B. (1969). New priorities in training: A guide for industry. New York: American Management Association.

Brandt, S.C. (1989). Foreword. New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Stevenson, H.H., Roberts, M.J., and Grousbeck, H.I. Homewood, Ill: Irwin.

Buber, M. (1958). I and Thou. Translated by Ronald Gregor Smith.New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Buber, M. (1966). The way of response. N.N. Glatzer, (ed.), New York: Schocken Books.

Buber, M. (1969). Genuine dialogue and the possibilities of peace (M. Friedman, trans.). In E.W. Williams & H. Zahn (Eds.), Men of dialogue: Martin Buber and Albrecht Goes (pp. 20-27), New York: Funk & Wagnalls. (Original work published 1957).

Carland, J.C., Carland, J.W. and Stewart, W. (1996). Seeing what’s not there: The enigma of entrepreneurship. Proceedings of the 20th National Small Business Consulting Conference, San Diego, CA., pp. 3-8.

Carlson, R. (1981). Studies in script theory: Adult analogs of a childhood nuclear scene. Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 501-510.

Carter, J. (2006). Palestine: Peace not apartheid. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Cates, J.N. and Sussman, M.B. (1992). Family systems and inheritance. Family business review, Vol. V, No. 2, pp. 205-226

Chacko, T.I. (1983). Student ratings of instruction: A function of grading standards. Eductional Research Quarterly, 8 (2), 20-25.

Childs-Gowell, E. (1979). Bodyscript Blockbusting. Seattle, Washington.

Childs-Gowell, E. (1992). Good Grief Rituals. Station Hill Press. Childs-Gowell, E. (2001). Regression and protection: How to provide safety when working with deeply wounded clients. Seattle, Washington.

Christensen, C.R. and Hanson, A.J. (1986). Teaching and the case method. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

Christensen, C.R., Garvin, D.A., & Sweet, A. (Eds.). (1991).Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Christensen, C.R. (1992). Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership. New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.

Chomsky, N. (1987). The chomsky reader, J. Peck, ed. New York: Pantheon books.

Chomsky, N. (2005). Imperial ambitions: Conversations on the post-9/11 world, interviews with David Barsamian. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Clarke, J.I. and Dawson, C. (1998). Growing up again: Parenting ourselves, parenting our children. Center City: Minn.: Hazelden, 1998. Clarke, J.L. (1999). Connections: The threads that strengthen families. Center City, Minnesota: Hazelden.

Cockburn, A. (2007, May 14). Is global warming a sin? The Nation, Vol 284, No. 19.

Cohen, A.R, Fink, S, Gadon, H. & Willits, R. (1992). Effective behavior in organizations: Learning from the interplay of cases, concepts, and student experiences (5th ed.). Homewood, Ill: Irwin.

Cohn, M. (1990). Passing the torch: Transfer strategies for your family business. US: Liberty Hall Press.

Collins, O. and Moore, D. (1970). The organization makers: A behavioral study of independent entrepreneurs. New York: Appleton- Crofts.

Collins, J.C. & Lazier, W.C. (1995). Managing the small to mid-sized company. Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Cooper, M. (2007, Sept. 10/17). GOP clutches at Iowa straws: The party’s burdened by an unpopular war. The Nation, Vol. 285, No. 7.

Cornell, W.F. (1988). Life script theory: A critical review from a developmental perspective. Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 270-282.

Cox, William John. (2004). You’re not stupid! Get the truth: A brief on the Bush Presidency. Joshua Tree, CA: Progressive Press.

Darwin, C. (1859). The origin of species: By means of natural selection or The preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. Reprinted 1998. New York: The Modern Library.

Dawkins, R. (2004). The ancestor’s tale: A pilgrimage to the dawn of evolution. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Dennis, W. J. (1993). A small business primer. Washington, D.C.: National Federation of Independent Business.

Dennis, W.J. (2000). NFIB Small Business Policy Guide. Washington, D.C.: National Federation of Independent Business.

Dewey, John. (1935). Democracy in education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.

de Young, J. (1991). Cases in small business management: A strategic problems approach. Dover, New Hampshire: Upstart Publishing Company, Inc.

Doherty, W.J. (1997). The intentional family: How to build family ties in our modern world. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Dooley, A.R., & Skinner, W. (1977, April). Casing case method methods. Academy of Management Review, 2(2).

Drego, Pearl (2005). Acceptance speech on receiving the 2004 Eric Berne Memorial Award at Edinburgh, Scotland. Transactional analysis journal. Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 7-30.

Diamond, J. (2006). Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking Penguin.

Dressel,P.L.(1961).Evaluation in higher education. Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company.

Dusay, J. (1972). Egograms and the constancy hypothesis. Transactional Analysis Journal. 2(3), 37-41.

Eagle Executive (2006). University impacts region by more than $650 million. Jim Davis, editor, Vol. 20, No. 1, pg 12. Statesboro, GA: College of Business Administration, Georgia Southern University.

Eckblad, G. (1981). Scheme theory: A conceptual framework for cognitive-motivational processes. London: Academic Press.

Egan, T. (2006). The worst hard time: The untold story of those who survived the great American dust bowl. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

English, F. (1971). The substitution factor: Rackets and real feelings, Part I,” Transactional Analysis Journal. 1(4), 27-32.

English, F. (1972). Rackets and real feelings, Part II. Transactional Analysis Journal. 2(1), 23-25.

English, F. (1988). Whither scripts? Transactional Analysis Journal, 18, 292-303.

Ernst, F. (1971). The OK corral: The grid for get on with. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1971, 1(4), 231-240

Ernst, K (1972). Games students play, and what to do about them. Millbrae, CA: Celestial Arts Publishing,.

Erskine, R. and Moursund, J. (1988). Integrative psychotherapy in action. Highland, New York: The Gestalt Journal Press, Inc.

Fischer, Judith, D. (2004). The use and effects of student ratings in legal writing courses: A plea for holistic evaluation of teaching. Legal writing: The journal of the legal writing institute, Volume 10.

Fontaine, James (1838). A Tale of the Huguenots or Memoirs of a French Refugee Family, Translated and Compiled from the Original Manuscripts of James Fontaine by One of His Descendants, with an Introduction by F.J. Hawkes, D.D.,stithvalley.com/fontaine/ memoirsj.htm. The manuscript was first published by John S. Taylor, Theological and Sunday School Bookseller, Corner of Park Row and Spruce Street, New York, 1838.

Forbes (2003). B-Schools: The payback. Forbes magazine, October 13, 2003, 172(8), 72-74.

Freire, Paulo (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Freud, S. (1933). The complete introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. James Strachey (Trans. and Ed.), 1965. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 1966.

Fuller, R.B. (1969). Operating manual for spaceship earth. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Gagne, R.M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd. ed.). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gellert, S.A. (1983). Nuts come in pairs: All you ever wanted to know about couples’ relationships and were afraid to ask. New York: Cite Press.

Gilligan, James (1997). Violence: Reflections on a national epidemic. New York: Random House.

Ginsberg, Eli (1966). The development of human resources. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Gioia, D.A. and Poole, P.P. (1984). Scripts in organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 449-459.

Giroux, Henry. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.

Goldman, A.L. (1970). A theory of human action. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Gore, A. (2007). The assault on reason. New York: The Penguin Press.

Goulding, R. and Goulding, M. (1976). Injunctions, decisions, and redecisions. Transactional Analysis Journal, 6(1), 41-48.

Gragg, C.I. (1940). Because wisdom can’t be told. Originally published in the Harvard Magazine. In R. Stapleton (ed.), The Entrepreneur: Concepts and Cases on Creativity in Business. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America, 1985.

Graham, Benjamin (1973). The Intelligent Investor. New copyrighted material added by Jason Zweig, 2003. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. (1997a). Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings. American Psychologist, 52 (11), 1209-1216.

Greenwald, A.G. & Gillmore, G.M. (1997b). No pain, no gain? The importance of measuring course workload in student ratings of instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (4), 743-751.

Groder, M. (1977). Groder’s 5 OK diagrams. In G. Barnes (ed.), Transactional analysis after Eric Berne: Teachings and practices of three TA schools. New York: Harper’s College Press.

Groder, M. (1980). Business games: How to recognize the players and deal with them, New York: Boardroom Books.

Groder, M. (1996). The fractionated nature of human nature. Presentation at the Annual meeting of the International Transactional Analysis Association, August, 1996, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society, Vol. 1. Boston: Beacon Press.

Haskell, R.E. (1997). Academic freedom, tenure, and student evaluation of teachers: Galloping polls in the 21st century. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 5(6).

Harris, S. (2005). The end of faith: Religion, terror, and the future of reason. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Harris, T. (1967). I’m OK—You’re OK: A practical guide to transactional analysis. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

Hastorf, A.H. and Isen, A.M. (1982). Cognitive social psychology. New York: Elsevier North Holland, Inc.

Healy, P. (2001). Harvard’s quiet secret: Rampant grade inflation. The Boston Globe, October 7, 2001.

Hearn, C.G. (2002). Tracks in the sea: Matthew Fontaine Maury and the mapping of the oceans. Crawfordsville, IN: R. R. Donnelly.

Heathcote, A. (2006). Applying transactional analysis to the understanding of narcissism. Transactional analysis journal, 36(3), 228-234.

Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.

Hightower, J. (2003). Thieves in high places: They’ve stolen our country and it’s time to take it back. Viking: New York.

Hine, Jenni (2005). Brain structures and ego states. Transactional analysis journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 40-51.

Hobbes, Thomas (1651). Leviathan. J.C.A. Gaskin, Ed. (USA: Oxford University Press, 1998).

Hume, David (1738) A treatise of human nature, Vol.I. London, J.M. Dent & Sons and in New York by E.P. Dutton & Co.

ITAA (1998). Membership Directory of the International Transactional Analysis Association. San Francisco, CA.

Hosmer, L.T., Cooper, A.C., & Vesper, K.H. (1977). The entrepreneurial function: Text and cases on smaller firms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Jackson, P.W. (1977). Comments on CHAPTER 11 by Berliner and Rosenshine, in Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge, Anderson, R.C., Spiro, W.E., and Montague, W.E., (eds.). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Jacobs, A. (1991). Aspects of Survival: Triumph over death and onliness. Transactional Analysis Journal. 21(1). 4-11.

Jaffe, D.T. (1990). Working with the ones you love: Conflict resolution and problem solving strategies for a successful family business. Berkeley, CA: Conari Press.

James, Muriel and Jongeward, D. (1973). Born to win: Transactional analysis with gestalt experiments, Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

James, M. (1974). Self Reparenting: Application to Script Analysis. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(3) 32-39.

James, M. (1975). The OK Boss. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Jongeward, D. (1973). Everybody wins: Transactional analysis applied to organizations. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. (1999). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Johnson, V.E. (2002). An A is an A is an A . . . and that’s the problem. New York Times, Section 4A, Page 14, Column 1.

Joines, V. and Stewart, I. (1987). TA today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham and Chapel Hill: Lifespace Publishing.

Kahler, Taibi and Capers, Hedges (1974). The Miniscript. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(1), 26-42.

Kant, Immanuel (1781) Critique of pure reason, second ed 1787, first published 1781, translated by Norman Kemp Smith, Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, London: Macmilan & Co Ltd; New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1963

Kao, J. (1989). Entrepreneurship, creativity, & organization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis, Transactional Analysis Bulletin. 7(26), 39-43.

Karpman, S. (1975). The bias box for competing psychotherapies. Transactional Analysis Journal, 5, 107-116.

Keynes, J.M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1991.

Lankton, S.R. (1980). Practical magic: A translation of basic neuro-linguistic programming into clinical psychology. Cupertino, CA: Meta Publications.

Lea, J.W. (1991). Keeping it in the Family. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

LeDoux, J. (1994). Emotion, memory and the brain. Scientific American, 270(6), 50-57.

LeDoux. J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone Books.

LeDoux, J. (2002). Synaptic Self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Penguin Putnam.

Lloyd, S. (2006). Programming the universe: A quantum computer scientist takes on the cosmos. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Lord, R.G. and Kernan, M.C. (1987). Scripts as determinants of purposeful behavior in organizations. Academy of management review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 265-277.

Loria, B.R. (1991). Integrative family therapy: A constructivist perspective. In B.R. Loria (Ed.) The stamford papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference (pp. 34-41). Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Kauffman. S.A. (1993). The origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution, New York: Oxford Univ. Press.

Malthus, Thomas (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, as it Affects the Future Improvement of Society with Remarks on the Speculations of Mr. Godwin, M. Condorcet, and Other Writers. London: J.Johnson.

Marx, Karl (1867). Das kapital: A critique of political economy. Chicago: Henry Regnery Company.

Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Maturana, H.R. and Varela, F.J. (1987). The tree of knowledge. Boston: New Science Library.

Maury, D.H. (1894). Recollections of a Virginian in the Mexican, Indian, and Civil Wars. NewYork: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

Maury, M.F. (1836). A new theoretical and practical treatise on navigation. Philadelphia: Key and Biddle.

Maury, M.F. (1855). Physical geography of the seas. New York: Harper & Brothers. Now available from amazon.com as The physical geography of the seas and its meteorology. Dover Publications, 2003.

McCulloch, W.S. (1988). Embodiments of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.

McKenna, J. (1974). Stroking profile: Applications to script analysis, Transactional Analysis Journal, 4(4), 20-24.

Mieczkowski, B. (1991). Dysfunctional bureaucracy: A comparative and historical perspective. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Mieczkowski, B. (1995). The rot at the top: Dysfunctional bureaucracy in academia. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Moore, M. (2001). Stupid white men and other sorry excuses for the state of the nation! New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.

Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. W.H. Freeman and Company: San Francisco.

Nisbett, R. and Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice- Hall, Inc.

Novey, Theodore (2002). Measuring the effectiveness of transactional analysis: An international study. Transactional Analysis Journal, 32: 1, pp. 8-25.

Osnes, R. (1974). Spot Reparenting. Transactional Analysis Journal. 4(3), 40-46.

Osnes, R. and Gesme, C. (2000). Life is a celebration. Edina, Minnesota: Beaver’s Creek Press.

Pascal, B. (1669). The Pensees (thoughts). A defense of the Christian religion by Blaise Pascal, a renowed 17th century philosopher and mathematician. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. En.wikipedia. org/wiki/Pensees.

Perls, F. S. (1969). Gestalt therapy verbatim. Moab, Utah: The Real People Press.

Perls, F. (1969). In and out of the garbage pail. Moab, Utah: The Real People Press.

Piaget, J. (1971). The grasp of consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Popper, K.R. and Eccles, J.C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin/ New York/London: Springer International.

Powers, R. (2006). Mark Twain: A Life. New York: Free Press.

Prince, G.M. (1970). The practice of creativity: A manual for dynamic group problem solving. New York: Collier Books.

Random House Dictionary of the English Language. (1967). Stein, Jess, Urdang, and Laurence, editors, New York: Random House.

Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Ronstadt, R.C. (1985). Entrepreneurship: Text, cases, and notes. Dover, MA: Lord Publishing Company.

Russell, B. and North, A.N. (1910, 1912, 1913). Principia Mathematica, 3 Vols. Cambridge: At the University Press. Russell, B. (1959). My philosophical development. London: George Allen and Unwin; New York: Simon and Schuster.

Russell, B. (1967, 1968, 1969). The autobiography of Bertrand Russell, 3 vols. London: George Allen and Unwin; Boston and Toronto: Little Brown and Company (Vols 1 and 2); New York: Simon and Schuster (Vol. 3).

Schiff, A. L. and Schiff, J. (1971). Passivity. Transactional Analysis Journal, 1(1), 71-78.

Schrage, Harry. (1965). The R & D Entrepreneur: Profile of Success. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 43, Nov.-Dec., p. 56.

Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Schumpeter, J.A. (1951). Imperialism and social classes. New York: A.M. Kelly, Oxford, Blackwell.

Simon, H.A. (1957). Administrative behavior (1st ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Simon, H.A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision- making processes in administrative organizational (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, reprinted as The Wealth of Nations (New York: Modern Library, Inc., 1937).

Soros, G. (2006). The age of fallibility: Consequences of the war on terror. New York: Public Affairs.

Statesboro Herald (2006, September 18). Chambliss observes effects of global warming: Recent trip to Greenland gives New Perspective. Statesboro, GA: Statesboro Publishing Company, p. 1.

Stapleton, R.J. (1970). An analysis of rural manpower migration patterns in the South Plains region of Texas. (Doctoral dissertation). Washington, DC: Department of Labor, Office of Manpower Evaluation and Research, National Technical Information Service (PB188048). file:///Users/richardstapleton/Downloads/31295004728316-2.pdf

Stapleton, R.J. (1976). Managing creatively: Action learning in action. Washington, D.C.: University Press of America.

Stapleton, R.J. (1978). The chain of ego states. Transactional Analysis Journal. 8(3), 215-219.

Stapleton, R.J. (1979a, April). The classroom de-gamer. Transactional Analysis Journal. 9(2), 145-146.

Stapleton, R.J (1979b). De-gaming teaching and learning: How to motivate learners and invite Okness. Statesboro, GA: Effective Learning Publications.

Stapleton, R.J. (1984). Implications of small business prospectuses developed by business students. In D. Ray (Ed.) Proceeedings of the 1984 Annual Meeting of the Southern Management Association, pp. 228-230.

Stapleton, R.J. (1985). The entrepreneur: Concepts and cases on creativity in business. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.

Stapleton, R.J., & Murkison, G. (1988, October). Entrepreneurial learning and small business failure rates. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting, The Institute of Management Sciences Southeastern CHAPTER, Myrtle Beach, SC.

Stapleton, R.J. (1989-1990). Academic entrepreneurship: Using the case method to simulate competitive business markets. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. Vol. XIV, No. IV, pp. 88-104.

Stapleton, R.J. and Murkison, G. (1990). Scripts and entrepreneurship. Transactional Analysis Journal, Vol. 20, No. 3, July, pp. 193-197.

Stapleton, R.J. (1991). Game-freer teaching and learning; How to increase intellectual productivity in schools by decreasing psychological games. In B.R. Loria (Ed.) The Stamford Papers: Selections from the 29th annual ITAA conference, pp. 250-267. Madison, WI: Omnipress.

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1993). Feedback regarding a game-free case method process used to educate general management and entrepreneurship students. Proceedings of the 1993 Annual Meeting of the Southeast CHAPTER of the Institute for Management Science. Myrtle Beach, SC, October, 1993

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1994). Realistically estimating the magnitude and significance of business learning: Longitudinal feedback regarding a management learning process. Manuscript. Georgia Southern University.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (1996). Randomly selecting students to lead case method discussions: Problems and pitfalls in performance appraisal. Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Meeting of SE INFORMS, Myrtle Beach, SC, October, 1996. This paper won the Best Paper Award for the Education Innovation Track at the conference.

Stapleton, R.J. and Price, B. (1997). Fall Quarter Student Evaluation Research Findings. Manuscript. Department of Management, Georgia Southern University.

Stapleton, R.J., Murkison, G., and Stapleton, D.C. (1997). The significance of schemata and scripts in entrepreneurship education and development. In T.G. Monroy, J. Reichert, F. Hoy, & K. Williams (Eds.), The art and science of entrepreneurship education: Volume IV (pp, 89-104). Akron, OH: The Project for excellence in Entrepreneurship Education.

Stapleton, R. J. (1998). Business Voyages: Mental maps, scripts, schemata, and tools for finding and co-constructing your own business worlds. Monograph. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern Printing Services.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (1998). Teaching business using the case method and transactional analysis: A constructivist approach. Transactional Analysis Journal, 28(2), 157-167.

Stapleton, R. J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2001). Basic policies affecting the longevity of family businesses. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern CHAPTER of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.

Stapleton, R.J. and Murkison, G. (2001). Optimizing the fairness of student evaluations: A study of correlations between instructor excellence, study production, learning production, and expected grades. The journal of management education, 25(3), 269-292.

Optimizing the Fairness of Student Evaluations by now (April 5, 2021) has been cited as a reference in 75 refereed journal articles in most academic disciplines. https://studysites.sagepub.com/holt/articles/Stapleton.pdf

Stapleton, R. J. and Stapleton, D. C. (2002). Attitudes of family business owners regarding policies for transferring the wealth of family businesses, Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference, Small Business Institute Directors Association, February, San Diego, CA, pp. 172-177.

Stapleton, R.J. (2003). Georgia southern entrepreneurship: Activities, contributors, cases (4th ed.). Monograph. Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern Printing Services.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2003a). The truth of student evaluations. Manuscript.

Stapleton, R.J. and Stapleton, D.C. (2003b). The morality of university grading. Manuscript.

Stapleton, R.J., Stapleton, D.C., & Tomlinson, M. (2004). Factors in family business planning. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Small Business Institute Director’s Association. Clearwater Beach, FL, February. This article has been reprinted in several publications, including The Script, a publication of the International Transactional Analysis Association.

Stapleton, R.J. (2008)  Business Voyages: Mental Maps, Scripts, Schemata, and Tools for Discovering and Co-Constructing Your Own Business Worlds, Statesboro, Georgia: Effective Learning Publications, Amazon.com., 712 pages. https://www.amazon.com/Business-Voyages-Schemata-Discovering-Co-Constructing/dp/1413480810  

Stapleton, R.J. (2012) Recommendations for Waking Up From the American Nightmare, an eBook, Amazon.com., 253 pages. https://www.amazon.com/Recommendations-American-Nightmare-Business-Voyages-ebook/dp/B009TOJVPI 

Stapleton, R.J. (2016) Born to Learn: A Transactional Analysis of Human Learning, Statesboro, Georgia: Effective Learning Publications, https://www.amazon.com/Born-Learn-Transactional-Analysis-Learning/dp/0692584331/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1510510282&sr=8-1&keywords=born+to+learn++++richard+john+stapleton&dpID=414yiE-4%252BIL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch

Stapleton, R.J. (2020) “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”, Statesboro, GA: Effective Learning Publications, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc-3/

Stevenson, H., Roberts, M., & Grousbeck, H. (1994). New business ventures and the entrepreneur. Burr Ridge, Ill.: Irwin.

Stevenson, H.H.; Grousbeck, H.I.; Roberts, M.J.; and Bhide, A. (1999). New business ventures and the entrepreneur (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Steiner, C. (1971). The stroke economy. Transactional Analysis Journal. 1(3), 9-15.

Steiner, C. (1974). Scripts people live: Transactional analysis of life scripts. New York: Grove Press.

Steiner, C. M. (2003). Letter from the guest coeditor. Transactional Analysis Journal. 33(2), 111-114.

Stewart, I. and Joines, V. (1987). TA Today: A new introduction to transactional analysis. Nottingham and Chapel Hill: Lifespace Publishing.

The Economist (2001, April 12). All shall have prizes. London: Economist.com.

The Economist (2002, October 5). Who’s been cheating? Exams are about sorting the bright from the dim, not about demonstrating progress, 365(8293).

The Economist (2006, September 15-19). The heat is on: A special report on climate change. London, 380(8494).

Thompson, A.A., & Strickland, A.J. (1987). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.

Thompson, A. & Strickland, A. (1995). Strategic management: Concepts and cases. Chicago, Ill.: Irwin.

Thompson, A.A. & Strickland, A.J. (2003). Strategic Management: Concepts and Cases (13th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Thorndyke, P.W. and Hayes-Roth, B. (1979). The use of schemata in the acquisition and transfer of knowledge. Cognitive psychology, Vol. 11, pp. 82-106.

Timmons, Jeffrey A. (1994). New venture creation: Entrepreneurship for the 21st century. Burr Ridge, ILL: IRWIN

Tocqueville, A. de (1835). Democracy in America. H. Reeve, trans., P. Bradley, ed., Everyman’s Library, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994.

Towl, A.R. (1969). To study administration by cases. Boston: Harvard University Press.

USAToday (2007, February 21). Pension tension: More and more retirees are finding it pays to have worked for the government instead of the private sector. McLean, VA; Gannett Company, Inc., p. 2A

Veblen, T. (1902). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

Vesper, Karl H. (1996). New venture experience: Text, exercises, cases. Seattle, WA: Vector Books.

Von Foerster, Heinz (1984). “On constructing a reality”, in The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know. Paul Watzlawick (Ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Von Glaserfeld, E. (1988). The construction of knowledge: Contribution to conceptual semantics. Salinas, CA: Intersystems Publications.

Wagner, Abe (1991). Say it Straight or You’ll Show it Crooked. Denver, Colorado: Abe Wagner and Associates.

Walsh, D. (1985). Selling out America’s children. Minneapolis: Fairview Press, 1994.

Ward, P.D. (2006, October). Impact from the deep: Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and sea, not asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass extinctions. Scientific American, Vol. 295, No. 4, pp. 65-71.

Watzlawick, P. (1984). The invented reality: How do we know what we believe we know?: Contributions to constructivism. (P. Watzlawick, ed.). New York: W.W. Norton & Company.

Weiner, J. (1995). The beak of the finch: A story of evolution in our time. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. First published in 1953.

Wittgenstein, L. (1971), Prototractatus, an early version of Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, edited by B.F. McGuinness, T. Nyberg, and G.H. von Wright, with a translation by D.F. Pears and B.F. McGuinness with an historical introduction by G.H. von Wright and a facsimile of the author’s manuscript. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. First published in 1921.

Wood, J.D. and Petriglieri, G. (2005). Transcending polarization: Beyond binary thinking. Transactional analysis journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 31-39.

                  APPENDIXES

Rout Logger’s Creator’s Genetic, Psychological, and Social Inheritance

Rout Logger’s Creator’s Resume

ROUT LOGGER’S GROUP: TO SAVE SPACESHIP EARTH — Internet Episode 7

By RICHARD JOHN STAPLETON

Rout Logger’s Group: To Save Spaceship Earth is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered to the public.

Copyright 2020 by Effective Learning Publications. All rights reserved. No part of this Internet novel may be copied or printed on paper without permission. Share on the Internet as you wish.

To refresh yourself about what happened in earlier episodes, go to the following website addresses:

Internet Episode 1, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-part-1/.   

Internet Episode 2, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-2/.

Internet Episode 3, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-three/.

Internet Episode 4, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-four/.

Internet Episode 5, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-five/.

Internet Episode 6,  https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-six/   

A list of names of forty cast members with a short biographical blurb about each is presented in Internet Episode 1.

INTERNET EPISODE SEVEN

After the advent of Covid-19 Rout Logger decided to discontinue the Spaceship Earth group project in its present format after considering several options and consulting with the group donors. After cancelling meetings in April, May, and June of 2020, Rout notified the group members of his decision in this email message:

“July 1, 2020

“Dear Spaceship Earth Group Members,

“After giving the matter considerable thought while consulting with the group donors, I have decided the best option is to permanently discontinue operations of this group because of the Covid-19 pandemic.

“I appreciate your participation and the contributions of each of you to our group meetings. In my opinion, and in the opinion of the group donors, the project was a success, achieving several of the goals set at the beginning, a major one being to demonstrate how Earthian humans from disparate walks of life can learn how not to play psychological Games in discussion groups, while co-constructing better time structuring patterns, transactional patterns, life positions, and scripts for dealing with existential problems.

“A final five-thousand-dollar bank deposit has been made to the bank account of each of you as a form of severance pay. I intended to continue the group for a few years, but the Covid-19 virus made that infeasible using a face-to-face format in real reality.

“I and the donors seriously considered establishing some sort of zoom-like process wherein this group would continue to meet in virtual reality using computers and the Internet, after furnishing each of you a home computer to use for group meetings, but we ultimately decided not to do it.

“The donors and I however have decided to pursue the development of a new computer program for audio-visual virtual reality Internet group discussion. We have formed a new corporation, Spaceship Earth, Inc., designed to research, develop, and produce new computer code and programming for such a system. We have hired several technical experts in this field who are now working on the project, funded by the donors.

“The Spaceship Earth virtual reality computer system will be able to accommodate forty group members who will be shown simultaneously around the perimeters of computer screens in the homes of group members. A digital Truther rooster, replete with rooster-crowing audio, positioned in the center of the screen, will be spun to digitally randomly-select Leaders of the Moment for all meetings as we did manually in our group sessions. After the rooster crowing ceases the Truther-selected leader will be enlarged on the screen as s/he does what leaders did in response to the spinning arrow of The Truther landing on them in our hotel room meetings: Define the problem(s), delineate and discuss alternatives, and make recommendations.

“A procedure will be programmed into the system that will enable participants to digitally raise their hands to respond to the Truther-selected leader of the moment. The first hand to go up will speak next, and other respondents will speak in the order in which they raised their hands, using the same procedure we used in our hotel room meetings regarding time allowed for speaking. No speaker will be interrupted before s/he decides to stop speaking, provided my counterpart, a Rout Logger-like moderator for the group, does not decide a speaker is playing a psychological Game conducting a filibuster-like sabotage, such as used in the USian senate, malevolently trying to destroy Adult democratic discussion using ulterior Parent and Child ego state transactions. Should this happen, the group moderator will loudly clang a cowbell to stop the speaking. The group member attempting to destroy democracy will be muted and removed from the screen if s/he persists with this behavior.

“We hope to have the computer system up and running in few months, at which time we will provide the system to Spaceship Earth democracy chapters around Spaceship Earth that will download the new computer system for their group members, who will use a Game-free process analogous to what we used in hotel room real face-to-face meetings, to facilitate Adult democratic discussions of psychological, social, economic, religious, and political states of affairs among group members from all walks of life, primarily to prevent Earthian human extinction caused by human-caused global warming, climate change, and nuclear war, caused by obsolete and dangerous authoritarian human feeling, thinking, understanding, believing, and doing.

“While there is no way this virtual reality computer-based system using the Internet can be as effective producing the above results as real reality face-to-face meetings it can produce some of the same results, and it could potentially involve large numbers of people around Spaceship Earth in relatively short order.

“Please consider starting a Spaceship Earth democracy chapter where you live when we get the new computer system operational.

“Thanks again for your group participation and contributions toward making this democracy project a reality.

“Best wishes to you all.

“Rout Logger” 

TO BE CONTINUED…

THE EARTHIAN — 22

THE EARTHIAN, Number Twenty-Two, Effective Learning Publications, https://effectivelearning.net/effective-learning-publications/ 32 East Main Street, Statesboro, Georgia, USA, March 18, 2021.   

THE EARTHIAN is a digest of articles containing facts, perspectives, theories, models, analyses, and recommendations concerned about existential states of affairs affecting all species of fauna and flora around Spaceship Earth. Recent relevant articles written and published by intelligent hard-hitting truth-seeking writers in Internet journals about psychological, social, economic, political, military, religious, and ecological states of affairs around Spaceship Earth are linked below as sources, following a usual comment by the editor.

“ASK LESS WHAT YOUR NATION CAN DO FOR YOU—ASK MORE WHAT YOU CAN DO FOR SPACESHIP EARTH”

OR SO IT SEEMS TO ME RIGHT NOW

By Richard John Stapleton

Hallelujah, we almost got rid of Trump being thrown in our faces daily on computer and TV screens, at least for now, except for a muchly-reduced flow of posts and news reports about the civil and criminal court cases he now faces and what he’s doing to harvest more millions of dollars from his marks and gang members, aka followers and supporters, while playing his usual psychological Games with the Repug party, with an eye toward running again for president in 2024, thanks to his Repug gang members in the USian senate Rescuing him by voting to acquit in his 2021 impeachment trial, insulting common sense and consensual truth, given the exemplary Dem impeachment trial managers proving beyond a reasonable doubt Trump incited an insurrection against the US government on January 6, 2021.

Now that Trump has waned from view we are seeing and hearing more posts about Joe Biden, the new USian president, pop up on our computer and TV screens. He seems to be doing a decent job domestically, getting Covid vaccinations jabbed into the arms of millions in relatively short order, doing a good job compared to what Trump did about Covid, very little.

Biden and the Dems have passed with a party line vote a Covid relief/rescue package worth $1.9 trillion to recipients. The Biden administration has now started bombing Syria again reinstating the neoliberal Dem foreign policies of Obama and Clinton, while maintaining the sanctions Trump and his cronies in the State Department imposed on Venezuela and Iran.

After the end of World War II in 1945, a war the US helped win, rather than lay down its arms and live peacefully with other sovereign nations at war’s end, the US has been since that time up to the present day almost constantly at war with someone, having not won a war in the 75-year interval. While fighting in WWII may have been necessary for defense, the US having been attacked and threatened by Japan at Pearl Harbor, all USian wars since have been discretionary offensive wars designed to create advantages and benefits for the USian military-industrial-intelligence-financial complex and presumably for the USian people, and all Earthian humans, for that matter. The wars have been sold as global do-gooderism, doing things such as spreading democracy; stopping the spread of communism; controlling global oil, scarce minerals, and other natural resources; and maintaining the reserve currency status of the “American” dollar to facilitate global trade.

Up until 1980 or so it appeared these discretionary wars paid off economically for most USians. Real incomes in the US generally increased from year to year after 1945 for all classes, lower, middle, and upper, up until about 1980. Since then however real incomes stagnated or declined for most of the USian lower and middle classes while incomes and wealth of the elite rich, the upper one percent, dramatically increased, creating gut-wrenching inequality. If discretionary offensive USian wars paid off after 1980 it was primarily for the elite rich.

These discretionary wars have entailed the US playing psychological Games internationally such as IF IT WEREN’T FOR YOU, regime change wars, and NOW I’VE GOT YOU, YOU SOB, punitive wars for heinous actions against the US economy and the American dollar. Here of late the US government has developed a new form of warfare known as “sanctions”—punishments inflicted on other countries and their people, actions such as freezing foreign bank accounts, and preventing certain countries, such as Iran and Venezuela, from selling their oil in certain markets, creating economic hardships and suffering for their people.

Joe Biden has come across socially in his speeches as president as a compassionate and considerate good guy, speaking courteously in humble tones, espousing desires to work for the good of all USians, not just those who voted for him. This is refreshing compared to Trump who went out of his way to come across socially in his speeches as an arrogant, bellicose, threatening, wise-ass, cocky crime boss, not caring about anyone or anything but himself and his aggrieved loser-survivor supporters, vowing to make “America” “great” again for them.

Psychologically Biden’s historical voting record during his fifty-years-plus in the US congress has not always been compassionate or considerate. When it came time to vote for bombing Iraq or vote for Clinton’s crime bill that greatly increased the USian prison population, Biden sided with his cronies in Congress and the elite rich, not we the people. Nor has his record been psychologically compassionate or considerate for USian people suffering from exorbitant pharmaceutical bills, predatory student loan debt, and predatory credit card interest and special charges.

It would be nice to think happy days are here again, with Biden as president rather than Trump, but for sure that’s not the case. Yes, it’s good there’s light at the end of the Covid tunnel, aided and abetted by Biden. Hopefully the US will get the Covid disaster under control by the end of this year as more and more people get vaccinated and more and more become immune, but the overall Usian plight has not changed much. Biden socially told the deep state before he got elected there would not be any major changes if he got elected.

It’s one thing to change the social and psychological transactions and personalities of egotistical presidents; it’s another to change the policies of neoliberal Dems and conservative Repugs. Both parties are right of center bought and paid for by big money donors in big banks, the for-profit health care industry, the oil industry, the defense industry, high tech, and large corporations of various stripes. Since the Reagan revolution of 1980 the US has more and more become a plutocratic corporate state.  

What is normal? Is normal the economic conditions the US had before Covid hit in March 2020, what Trump called the greatest economy in US history, all caused by him of course. Seems to me however the burst of retail sales growth and job growth (mainly gig jobs with no security) at that time was largely due to Trump’s tax cuts and increased military spending that significantly increased the federal budget deficit and debt, now some twenty-eight trillion dollars in piled-up debt and three trillion dollars per year in deficit red ink, which will significantly increase as the treasury borrows new money to fund the new stimulus and/or rescue package. And what will happen after the stimulus money is paid out? Will the Fed govt have to do it again over and over to avert market bubble collapses and social unrest? And how many times can they do it again before the US govt goes bankrupt? According to one of the Sources listed below in this issue of The Earthian the USian Federal Reserve system will keep creating more funny money out of thin air, by punching digits into their computers and calling the resulting numbers money, to buy US treasury bills and notes to fund the budget deficit, knowing full well sooner or later this is going to ignite serious inflation, which is OK with them since all this funny money creation and helicopter money dissemination in rescue packages will make it easier for the US treasury to service their Federal Reserve debt with cheaper funny money dollars that will buy less and less per dollar in the real economy, aka debasing the dollar. Meanwhile Fed overnight interest rates and US Treasury bond and bill rates will stay low, sometimes get below zero, as far as the eye can see, to stave off as long as possible the macro financial process reaching the end of the line. When will that be? Nobody knows.

Seems to me “normal” would mean USians working in stable fulltime jobs that pay a living wage with good benefits, such as health insurance and retirement plans, with only frictional unemployment temporarily caused by people changing jobs or looking for jobs after graduating from high school or college, about four percent per year. This sort of normal started becoming less normal around 1980 when USian corporations started seriously outsourcing high wage blue collar jobs to low wage countries and using more and more robots and automated processes instead of human labor. Seems to me the only way to get back to pre-1980 happier days in the US is to redefine what work is and pay humans to think with mind grants, not to do physical work that robots and machines can do cheaper and better, while decreasing the USian human population through natural attrition, natural deaths exceeding births, to increase the size of yearly economic pie slices for lower and middle class people taken from a smaller and more rational national economic pie baked each year (aka GNP), requiring less resource consumption and less fossil fuel energy to control global warming and climate change, and prevent nuclear war.

Bringing changes such as these about will require significant changes in the way humans feel, think, and behave around Spaceship Earth so as to create new psychological, social, economic, religious, and political systems and processes, creating a “new” normal that has never existed. MAGA-type magical thinking will not get the job done because the US and all Earthian countries have never produced satisfactory jobs and incomes for everyone. Some countries may have made “progress” here and there through time but none have ever been “great”.

No country can be OK unless all countries are OK­—not great but OK.

We’re OK—You’re Not OK life positions used to formulate foreign policy by rogue countries (such as the US under Trump) exacerbate Earthian Not-OKness, causing premature deaths, poverty, suffering, destruction, and population dislocations.

Biden’s new crisis on the USian southwestern border caused by thirteen thousand or so unaccompanied children from Central America and South America being left on the USian doorstep in North America exemplifies the problem. The best foreign policy for curing the “immigration” problem is to help all countries become OK, so no one will be forced by necessity to emigrate. Seems to me undermining the OKness of other countries, however Not-OK they might be, with wars, sanctions, and covert intelligence agency operations, will only make the problem worse. 

Before presenting in this issue of The Earthian Sources of new perspectives by various authors on current economic, psychological, social, religious, and political states of affairs around Spaceship Earth, I herein present some transactional analysis ideas, variables, and processes that I think might help all Earthian humans make changes in the ways they feel and think about psychological, social, economic, religious, and political processes that might help bring about salutary feeling, thinking, and doing processes around Spaceship Earth for preventing and eliminating existential threats such as global warming, climate change, and nuclear war.  

Ego states are states of being including thoughts, beliefs, behaviors, feelings, gestures, body language, and other signals determining how people come across with others in communication episodes, whether parent-like, adult-like, or child-like, in all kinds of situations.  People switch ego states depending on who they are communicating with and what sort of circumstances they are in, whether they are parenting, working, socializing, teaching, having fun, playing Games, or whatever.  They transmit messages from three ego states in themselves to three ego states in others in pair vectors, Parent-Parent, Adult-Adult, Child-Child, Parent-Child, Child-Adult, Adult-Parent, or whatever possibility.  These transactions are especially meaningful in situations in which there is some sort of authoritarian system involved, such as parents parenting children in homes, teachers teaching students in schools, or bosses bossing subordinates in a business or political organization, which normally entail primarily Parent-Child transactions. In general however the more Adult-Adult transactions there are the better things go in families, schools, businesses, and political organizations. 

Script messages are transmitted socially and psychologically as I have shown and explained with diagrams in my books. Unfortunately I have not shown one of these diagrams in this article, having not invested time and energy to get jpeg pictures of them made and get them posted to my computer desktop to download into this WordPress program. Ah, the joys of desktop publishing. Yeah, right, I probably am a little lazy. If you want to see what a transactional analysis script diagram looks like right now scroll to the top of this page and click on ELR Editor’s Daily Shares. You can see a picture of a TA script diagram in the assemblage of pictures on the top left of the page that will pop up, having been accepted by my Facebook program in a non-jpeg format.

A TA life script diagram shows the three stacked Parent, Adult, and Child ego state circles representing parent, adult, and child ego states for each parent and child. The solid lines in the diagram denote overt spoken social messages and dotted lines denote covert psychological unspoken ulterior messages.  Social messages are verbalized overt auditory messages; psychological messages are covert non-spoken ulterior messages transmitted by body language, emotional states, and after the fact positive or negative stroking as people react to situations and feel and do things.

Scripts in families are created automatically when parents transmit various messages to their children from various ego states socially and psychologically, in and out of awareness.  Scripts are life plans are generally decided before the age of eight by offspring based on script messages transmitted to them by their parents and others.  Since parents by and large transmit the same script messages that were transmitted to them before they were eight years old script messages in families can remain intact for many generations.  According to transactional analysts script decisions made before the age of eight have lasting effects determining three general life outcomes:  winner, loser, and non-winner.  These decisions can be redecided and updated later in life but it’s not easy for most people. 

Psychological Child-Child ego state script injunctions are what cause the most trouble for people in their lives.  These script injunctions forbid appropriate behavior in the here and now. Script injunctions are caused by emotional and behavioral requirements created by families through time as they adapted to and coped with problems and environmental forces that may have been appropriate in past environments, but which are inappropriate and ineffective in different here and now environments. 

Opposing script messages transmitted by parents can put a child in a Not-OK bind in childhood and throughout adolescence, assuming a divorce has not already occurred, causing considerable trouble within a family, since the child cannot please both parents in the presence of both parents, which can put parents in worse Not-OK positions if the child makes a decision about which parent is right, increasing Not-OKness in the family system as a whole.  

What many people need is psychological permission to violate and ignore their psychological outdated obsolete family Child ego state script message Injunctions, not only to increase their own OKness but the OKness of all living members of the family system, and the OKness of Earthian humans in general.

Two common family script Injunctions in most cultures are Don’t Think about the true nature and causes of states of affairs and Don’t Feel certain feelings, such as mad, glad, sad, and scared, when certain things happen in certain environments.

Joe Biden at least socially comes across projecting an I’m OK—You’re OK life position. Donald Trump on the other hand came across socially and psychologically projecting an I’m OK, my buddy is OK, nothing else is OK, and we are going to make the world pay life position.

Here is what Martin Groder, MD, one of my transactional analysis mentors at Chapel Hill, NC in the late 1970s, the best mentor I ever had, thought about life positions in what I called Martin Groder’s People Map, in a passage I wrote and published in 2011 in my book Business Voyages: Mental Maps, Scripts, Schemata and Tools for Discovering and Co-Constructing Your Own Business Worlds, pp. 148-150:

“The Human Spectrum”

“Humans generally give little thought to what kind of human they are and where they fit in the spectrum of various types of humans. Innumerable philosophers, psychiatrists, social scientists, preachers, priests, writers in various fields, and other types have described and categorized humans in various ways. Following is a schema developed by Martin Groder, MD, a psychiatrist, organizational development consultant, and entrepreneur, who also had an undergraduate degree in physics (Groder, 1977). Groder developed this schema while working with maximum security inmates of the federal prison system at Marion, Illinois in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. He was involved in a process of changing hard-core criminals into law-abiding citizens. Such a process would challenge the abilities of the most skillful and powerful of change agents.

“According to Groder, humans vary on two fundamental spatial dimensions. One dimension is Okness, which he estimates on the horizontal axis of Figure 1 (sorry, I could not get the Figure 1 image to copy and paste here, so you’ll just have to imagine it); the other dimension is the energy level of the individual estimated on the vertical axis of the space.

“People vary in terms of how OK they see, feel about, and experience, (1) themselves, (2) the other individual, (3) their group, (4) other groups, and (5) the world. In Groder’s terms, they are OK or not-OK with respect to I, You, We, They, and It (the world). Groder estimates how OK they are on each of these five existential dimensions on a scale of -1 to +1, -1 being as not-OK as possible and +1 being as OK as possible. Thus people with extremely high self-esteem would be at the +1 level regarding themselves; someone with extremely low self-esteem would be at the -1 level regarding themselves. People could exist at any level in between, at -.5, 0, +.25, etc. The same would be true of the positions of specific individuals with respect to buddies on a one-to-one basis, groups with which one belongs, other groups with which your group cooperates or competes, and the world in general. Summing the 5 existential OKness positions for an individual (I, You, We, They, and It), the highest possible OKness rating would be +5 and the lowest possible would be -5. A +5 person would have the highest possible feelings of Okness regarding his OKness, the OKness of his buddy, the OKness of his group, the OKness of other groups, and the OKness of the world. Such an individual would have very positive feelings and thoughts for self and others. On the other end of the spectrum, a -5 person would have the lowest possible feelings and thoughts for self and others. Very negative people tend to end up in prison. Very positive people tend to end up cultural heroes. Probably the most profitable attitude for an entrepreneur in a capitalistic economic system would be I’m OK, my employees are OK, my company is OK, the world is OK, but my competitors aren’t worth a damn, since this attitude would motivate his or her sales employees to steal business from competitors to increase the profit of the company.

“Entrepreneurs have higher energy levels than middle managers and normal people. It takes less energy to be a normal person than anything else. Entrepreneurs in Groder’s schema have approximately the same energy level on the vertical axis of Figure 1 as Monsters, the -3 OKness level convict leaders of other convicts. Monsters have the attitude “I’m OK, my buddy is OK, but everything else is not OK, and I am going to make the world pay.” According to Groder, it’s more difficult to change the energy level of a human than the OKness position. In rehabilitation work, Groder attempted to arc people across the gap of Figure 1, and make +3 OKness level entrepreneurs out of -3 monsters, +2 OKness middle managers out of -2 OKness creeps, slobs, lunch buckets, etc. Sometimes people arc across the gap the other way. Honest entrepreneurs can turn criminal. Entrepreneurs are winner-survivors; Monsters are loser-survivors.”

The trick to it all is setting appropriate goals and objectives, planning to do what you really want to do, can do, and should do given your natural abilities, scripting, and education, and the requirements and options of your environment that will produce satisfaction for you. How much money you get your hands on in the process beyond a certain level necessary to satisfy physical needs for food, clothing, shelter, and good health is irrelevant, if you aren’t addicted to playing psychological Games as compensation for poor scripting, in my opinion.

Without doubt Trump has a high energy level, but his OKness life position may be -3 or lower. Whether he’s a winner-survivor or a loser-survivor remains to be seen. Seems to me he has made his plight worse doing what he has done since losing the 2020 USian presidential race fair and square, such as his scripted telephone performance threatening and demeaning the Georgia Secretary of State and the Georgia Governor, not to mention all the honest hard working public servants who did their jobs well conducting the Georgia election. How seventy million or so USian voters could have voted in the first place for someone with Donald Trump’s kinds of personality and behavioral dysfunctions amazes me. This implies there might be seventy million loser-survivors in the US.

Trump had a hard life psychologically and emotionally undergoing his family scripting in his early years, despite what the billions of dollars he got his hands on could buy, including the USian presidency, resulting from leveraging about four hundred million dollars of family money he inherited.

No kind of economic or political system will work for everyone if bad guys get control of them at the top, which is why Georgians voting for Warnock and Ossoff for the US Senate in Georgia was so important, making it possible for Dems to pass with a party line vote in the US Congress the Covid Relief Act of 2021. One of the worst bad guys still at the top of the USian government right now is Mitchell McConnell, the Repug Not-OK now-minority leader in the USian senate, thankfully no longer the majority leader in control of the US Senate. If Warnock and Ossoft had not gotten elected….

In my opinion it’s not that Dems are paragons of virtue, intelligence, fairness, and compassion for all USians and Earthians but it seems to me right now they really are the lesser evil in USian politics. In my opinion they should have elected Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as president and vice president nominees in the 2020 primary races. Had they it seems to me Earthian humans would now be living in happier days than they are; but no one could prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. Trump might have beaten Bernie in the general election based solely on personality factors. Kurt Vonnegut once made an an astute comment about how awful it was for him to wake up one morning and realize his senior class in high school was now running the country.

I became a certified transactional analyst in education and organizations, a CTA, after passing written, oral, and experiential comprehensive exams administered by the International Transactional Analysis Association in 1978, after undergoing three years of once-a-month training, all day Saturday and half of Sunday, at the Southeast Institute at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

I have covered ego states and scripts in my books Business Voyages  and Born to Learn: A Transactional Analysis of Human Learninglisting common Parent ego state script messages and Child ego state injunctions.  All parents do not transmit the same script messages creating considerable variety among family scripts and outcomes.  Certain life scripts conveniently fit certain roles, jobs, professions, careers, and what have you more than others, providing fresh recruits already scripted for job openings, slots, roles, and positions in an economy, which is fine so long as the economy does not change very much.  Unfortunately in recent years in the United States the offshoring of high wage blue collar jobs to foreign low wage countries and the use of more and more automation has rendered many family scripts obsolete. 

Unfortunately, a bitter pill to swallow found embedded in my books Business Voyages and Born to Learn is that everything that happens is either predetermined or accidental, as the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein postulated in his book of propositions, Prototractatus; and therefore no one is to blame or praise. Believing and acting otherwise will simply perpetuate the same sorry I’m OK—You’re Not OK life position that has bedeviled humankind since time immemorial contributing to if not causing repeats of historical abominations such as genocides, wars, economic depressions, famines, mental illnesses, and social collapses.

For more information regarding my use of Transactional Analysis  https://www.itaaworld.org/  to create better discussion groups and democratic processes see my book Born to Learn:  A Transactional Analysis of Human Learning.  https://www.amazon.com/Born-Learn-Transactional-Analysis-Learning/dp/0692584331 

For more information on how to co-construct better organizations and economic systems using transactional analysis see my book   Business Voyages:  Mental Maps, Scripts, Schemata, and Tools for Co-Constructing Your Own Business Worlds   https://www.amazon.com/Business-Voyages-Schemata-Discovering-Co-Constructing/dp/1413480810

See my article “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc,”  https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc/   for some management science ideas on how human Earthians might eventually co-construct an economic system that is viable and satisfying for everyone aboard Spaceship Earth, making it possible for all Earthian humans to develop an I’m OK—You’re OK life position. 

This entails Earthians peacefully reducing through natural attrition the human population aboard Spaceship Earth, never doing work that machines can do better, and delegating the day-to-day management of systems for scheduling, producing, and distributing the necessities of life to artificial intelligence programs and supercomputers.

This can be done using linear programming based on the general algorithmic matrix algebra form

Max CjXj, s.t. AijXj ≤, =, or ≥ Bi

As I explained in “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.”   https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of-spaceship-earth-inc/  

Flying aboard an airliner about to land at night moving at four hundred miles an hour at thirty thousand feet with cloudy and rainy weather below, which would you rather have landing the plane, the plane’s radar and computer system or the pilot and co-pilot, seeing nothing out their windows but clouds and lightning?

I am indebted to Buckminster Fuller for teaching me in his book Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth the metaphor in the above paragraph and planting seeds for other ideas in my essay “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.,” such as computers being the best hope for mankind and humans not doing work that machines can do better, being paid to think instead with what Fuller called mind grants. To my knowledge Fuller was the inventor of the appellations Earthian and Spaceship Earth.   

For details regarding my transactional analysis and management science qualifications see my RJS Academic Vita at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/rjs-academic-vita/ .   

Learning De-Gamers

In case you might be wondering what the flat circular object under my left hand is in the picture above, it’s a Classroom De-Gamer™ I invented.  It has a spinner attached and there are concentric circles of numbers around its circumference to accommodate different numbers of students in classes. Each student gets a number and whoever’s number gets selected when the spinner is spun gets to be the leader of the moment leading a discussion of assigned reading, mostly factual cases in my courses. As you can see in my academic vita by clicking on the ELR Editor’s Academic Vita tab at the top of this page, I have published some professional journal articles and book chapters explaining how Learning De-Gamers de-Game psychological Games in learning situations. They will work in any situation in which there is teaching and learning going on, parents and children in homes, teachers and students in schools, bosses and employees in businesses, leaders and members in groups and organizations. Basically Learning De-Gamers cathect all Ego States in all participants and drastically reduce Rescuing, Persecuting, and Victimizing among participants, focusing Adult attention on solving relevant problems and issues not winning psychological Games. I used a Learning De-Gamer in all my classes for thirty-five years producing management learning with university students, and I used one on an as-needed basis over a five-year period consulting with a large manufacturing corporation discussing current problems with participants from all functions and levels of the plant in small mixed groups of ten or so participants, in a plant with several hundred employees, getting individuals out of their functional silos to discuss with others interrelated plant problems. I wrote about this experience in my ebook Recommendations for Waking Up From the American Nightmare, at https://www.amazon.com/Recommendations-American-Nightmare-Business-Voyages-ebook/dp/B009TOJVPI .

Learning De-Gamers facilitate a democratic way of teaching and learning involving sortition wherein everyone involved is OK with an equal shot at being the leader of the moment, a process ancient Greeks used to create democratic government during one of the most OK periods of Earthian human history, it seems to me. I think sortition and Learning De-Gamers should be used around Spaceship Earth today in as many teaching and learning situations as possible, including governmental legislative groups, especially in the USian House and Senate.

TO RESPOND:

As usual this month’s THE EARTHIAN  links and cites as SOURCES recent articles written and published by clear deep-thinking hard-hitting independent writers on various Earthian states of affairs.

Some Game playing goes on in the articles, i.e., a writer is psychologically persecuting, rescuing, or victimizing someone, but it seems to me the writers are generally trying to paint accurate pictures of what they think is really going on.

Unfortunately it seems to me one can build a case politicians spend most of their time playing psychological Games, mostly wasting their time and energy pastiming (bullshitting) and engaging in rituals (shuffling paper, filling out unnecessary forms, attending useless meetings with lawyers and others, and the like), running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Almost everything done in so-called foreign policy is a move in a psychological Game it seems to me.

It’s not easy, impossible some say, to separate relevant from irrelevant focal points in order to comprehend global cases, systems, and processes, while being inundated with fake news and true facts of states of affairs generated daily around Spaceship Earth, made public on the Internet, and elsewhere, to see what’s really going on, using primarily inductive and analogical reasoning, based on probability, not deductive logic. Almost never can anyone prove with deductive logic that a general proposition about psychological, social, economic, or political states affairs is absolutely true. About the best humans can hope for is to develop consensual answers that are generally acceptable and true based on probability.

It’s better to be honestly wrong than dishonestly wrong. Telling someone something you know is fake as if it were true is worse than telling someone something that’s fake because of genuine ignorance. A good case in point these days is most USians calling FICA insurance premium payments “payroll” taxes. It’s hard to know if sayers calling FICA payments payroll taxes really do not know any better or if they really do know better but are overtly lying about it go along with the crowd to get political brownie points for conforming to a group lie.

It seems to me most lying is lying by omission, people not telling people things they know are true that others need to know. Whether lying by omission is more or less harmful than lying by commission, telling people things you know are false and fake, is debatable, as is proving whether it’s getting easier or harder for most people to know what’s fake and what’s not. Political parties, Earthian governments, and Mainstream media lie by omission with alacrity, information about the Julian Assange case being a case in point.

If you have ideas on how to democratically discuss in Game-free ways economic and political problems and opportunities in something like the Ogeechee Economic Forum https://blog.effectivelearning.net/ogeechee-economic-forum/ go to our RESPONSES page and let us know about them at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/responses/ .

Feel free to respond with comments and criticisms about any of the SOURCES listed below using the RESPONSES post on this blog masthead at the top of this page; but please refrain from making ad hominem attacks. Criticize and correct any of the facts, data, evidence, reasoning, and conclusions in any of the articles; but please refrain from slandering and defaming the characteristics and reputations of the authors illogically using slanderous or defamatory comments trying to prove their arguments and conclusions in their articles are wrong, and yours are right.

I do not sell subscriptions or advertising or solicit donations for THE EARTHIAN or the Effective Learning Report but I would like to sell more books. If you feel you’ve gained value from THE EARTHIAN and would like to reciprocate go to our Effective Learning Publications page and purchase one or more copies of my books at  https://effectivelearning.net/effective-learning-publications/ .

FOR A FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO THE EFFECTIVE LEARNING REPORT AND THE EARTHIAN: Email rjstapleton@bulloch.net and enter the word Subscription on the subject line.     

Feel free to forward, share, post, print, or otherwise circulate this edition of The Earthian any way you see fit.  

Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, certified transactional analyst, educator, octogenarian emeritus professor of management, writer, editor and publisher.   

SOURCES:

March 18, 2021

It would be interesting to say the least.

“’Soul-less’ Putin Challenges ‘Killer’ Biden to a Live Debate,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/putin-responds-biden-killer-slur-it-takes-one-know-one?fbclid=IwAR1UmMkMSTxt2DZJg92rLhnE3imN1fwIjyNSvpjBoOFResCBrIhIU9tQExA.

March 18

A good idea

“Sanders’s Bill Would Hike Taxes on Big Corporations That Pay CEOs Over 50 Times More Than Median Workers,” by Jake Johnson, COMMONDREAMS, https://www.commondreams.org/news/2021/03/17/sanders-bill-would-hike-taxes-big-corporations-pay-ceos-over-50-times-more-median?fbclid=IwAR3pug1cM3jSelBphHztrDP3E9wGYtRIZZVOLJhqRS1MigpiBXk3J-me8Aw.

March 17

Never saw nothin’ like this before

Robots at Work Inside a Mercedes Factory, Skeffa Chimoto, https://www.facebook.com/richard.stapleton.397.

March 17

Seems right to me

“Racially Motivated Extremists, Militias Pose Most Lethal Domestic Threat, Report Finds,” by Warren P. Strobel and Rachael Levy, WALL STREET JOURNAL, https://www.wsj.com/articles/racially-motivated-extremists-militias-pose-most-lethal-domestic-threat-report-finds-11616011558?fbclid=IwAR0L4kucZsOIE4jumn54mgbBJEjmLZH_Tnltc9HmXRb3D1YiuI2jJWChY4I.

March 17

Assuming Ellsberg is correct in this article, the US already is a de facto military dictatorship, still pretending to be a democracy.

“Daniel Ellsberg Talks About Whistleblowing, The Pervasiveness of Official Lies, and The Dangers of The Espionage Act”, authored by Matt Taibbi, TK News, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/political/daniel-ellsberg-talks-about-whistleblowing-pervasiveness-official-lies-and-dangers?fbclid=IwAR0YVdtqtNSs9JIc96SdzdN_JpQ4nqMjSxkOpyB8X6nfYVEmvwIihCE4xV8.

March 17

Might be spot on; but one reason why this would not happen is that Earthian humans would make structural changes in their social, religious, economic, and political systems successfully dealing with the causes of today’s confluence of dire problems. What the probability of this happening is is anybody’s guess. Also gold, however valuable it might be in terms of whatever the Spaceship Earth reserve currency becomes if the Earthian ecosystem collapses, due to global warming and climate change or nuclear war, won’t do you much good if there is nothing to buy with it.

“Getting Ready for Gold’s Golden Era,” by Matthew Piepenburg, MATTERHORN ASSET MANAGEMENT, https://goldswitzerland.com/getting-ready-for-golds-golden-era/?fbclid=IwAR0azdtHw6vnrlSzNe7uyChNiuPwPpH3NAyXIV8Rp3SPydOI1_ydJlW0u_k.

March 17

USian Dems and Repugs formulating foreign policy are like Tweedle-dee and Tweedle-dum in Alice in Wonderland.

“Biden Persists with Failed Venezuela Policy,” by Ramzy Baroud, CONSORTIUM NEWS, https://consortiumnews.com/2021/03/17/biden-persists-with-failed-venezuela-policy/?fbclid=IwAR1UmMkMSTxt2DZJg92rLhnE3imN1fwIjyNSvpjBoOFResCBrIhIU9tQExA

March 17

Hard to believe

“There are More Socialists Than Democrats or Republicans,” by Ted Rall, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/17/there-are-more-socialists-than-democrats-or-republicans/?fbclid=IwAR39wNQ3GcRjDBFfztYAG7hXpsWPuPOs1ZYXICXabuGmM41b6tjnOQjYD-s.

March 17

Almost no real stories about immigration to what is now the US have ever been told in any detail in USian schools to more than a smattering of students. The fact is most people in the US are descended from immigrants who came to the USian part of the American continents to escape poverty in the countries they came from caused by individual and collective irresponsibility and malfeasance in those countries, primarily over-fecundity and over-population, but also political and religious corruption, superstition, persecution, and strife.

“The Real Irish American Story Not Taught in Schools – Zinn Education,” by Bill Bigelow, ZINN EDUCATION PROJECT, https://www.zinnedproject.org/if-we-knew-our-history/the-real-irish-american-story-not-taught-in-schools/?fbclid=IwAR2PdzJPRoE_xt9AbchKy60-tSf4aWSB7I9aKHzbuoSTtNplHRo-9StM75Q.

March 17

Scorched earth my ass. Get rid of this repug thug once and for all at Kentucky ballot boxes.

“McConnell’s Warning of a ‘Scorched-Earth’ Senate is an Empty Threat,” by Erin Levitz, INTELLIGENCER, https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/03/dems-shouldnt-take-mcconnells-advice-on-the-filibuster.html?fbclid=IwAR3-LcLOUZoIScHWaK5KTO17-OH7hgLXDHdi5FzbOOl66x_xY2tRAzqNGSQ.

March 17

Probably another sexually frustrated young male gone berserk. The fact this shooter targeted three Asian businesses and killed six Asian women probably proves his motives were caused by sexual and racism problems.

“8 Dead in Atlanta Spa Shootings, With Fears of Anti-Asia Bias,” THE NEW YORK TIMES, https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/03/17/us/shooting-atlanta-acworth?fbclid=IwAR3pug1cM3jSelBphHztrDP3E9wGYtRIZZVOLJhqRS1MigpiBXk3J-me8Aw.

March 16

Pretty much what we have been experiencing as time goes by. No USian citizen is smart enough to understand this drug bill crap in detail without spending untold hours trying to figure it out, listening and responding to robots and so-called menus on the telephone, trying to talk with a human about the problem at responsible insurance companies. How much politicians have been bought off by pharmaceutical companies is also hard to fathom. All we seniors know for sure is that our out of pocket pharmacy bills (copays etc.) for glaucoma, blood pressure, and other maladies keep going up, taking ever larger shares of our total disposable income, even if we have health insurance. It appears the pharmaceutical companies have no mercy for those held over a barrel, who have to go blind, get crippled, die early, or pay up, whatever they say.

“Perfidy Meets Putty – Congressional Democrats Betray Voters,” by Ralph Nader, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/16/perfidy-meets-putty-congressional-democrats-betray-voters/?fbclid=IwAR0azdtHw6vnrlSzNe7uyChNiuPwPpH3NAyXIV8Rp3SPydOI1_ydJlW0u_k.

March 16

“The idea that China or Russia pose a threat to you is so self-evidently ridiculous, so transparently absurd, that the only way to make you believe it would be is to propagandize you, writes Caitlin Johnstone.”

“Countering the Establishment’s Message,” by Caitlin Johnstone, CONSORTIUM NEWS, https://consortiumnews.com/2021/03/05/countering-the-establishments-message/?fbclid=IwAR3V4aRQivFkPPTPrXVsFMeL2nQoFIH_Aa_p9Wa0pcyri0XDHjtaMwD_nMw.

March 16

Hopefully they know what they are talking about.

“Phasing Out Fossil Fuels is Possible. These State-Level Plans Show How,” by C. J. Polychroniou, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/phasing-out-fossil-fuels-is-possible-these-state-level-plans-show-how/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR09mRHFEqr69M4MtGsMDJ7_ADSMZmIoG8ggvptOZgE6lZBbA53vnob6xcw.

March 15

“I don’t want you telling me to go back to Africa unless you going back where you come from…”

A Compelling Photo and Statement of Fannie Lou Hamer, by Nancy Davis-Sanders, RJS Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/richard.stapleton.397.

March 15

More authoritarianism may be inevitable. If so let’s hope it will be a benevolent authoritarianism, which seems possible if humans delegate control of economic and political affairs and operations to computers and artificial intelligence at the top. Given human historical experience I do not have any hope for individual humans making wise and fair economic and political decisions at the top of society. It seems historically all top dog decision makers became corrupt one way or the other given the opportunities and freedom they had at the top of their societies in their lofty positions to gratify their personal human egotistical needs and wants, irrespective of the needs and wants of others. Computers and AI do not have egotistical needs, wants, and human weaknesses.

“Expect Government Crackdowns in A ‘Global Depression’,” by Bruce Wilds, ADVANCING TIME, https://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2021/03/expect-government-crackdowns-in-global.html?fbclid=IwAR1R3Eku9NcAqKcci_F87Efpwh0CZaDNzhXTzhwXadL8gypO89k7mRo_K28.

March 14

Denmark is a democratic socialist/capitalist country that works better than the US for all its people. In order for the US to pay its McDonald’s, Walmart, and Amazon workers a living wage those at the top of the USian corporate state would have to take a smaller piece of the total USian economic pie every year. As shown in this picture such workers make $22 per hour in Denmark and have benefits and paid vacations. What gives?

“The Other 98%,” https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/fastfoodglobal,

March 14

Here’s a way you can learn at low cost how you can improve your performance to increase your satisfactions communicating with others using transactional analysis no matter how bad the economy or the environment might get.

“Transactional Analysis Tutoring,” by Richard John Stapleton, EFFECTIVE LEARNING REPORT, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/transactional-analysis-tutoring-3/?fbclid=IwAR3gn-JAAc0P9hDUDTaVxyJhOH3a7L1HE06GOajfcHCM6E1cpE5rXbqsaQU.

March 14

Hedges is the first economic, psychological, social, and political writer I have read other than me to advocate sortition in groups, embodied by my Classroom De-Gamer™, shown over and over in my social media picture fifteen years, a spinner to be spun, to democratically select a leader of the moment, to democratically discuss three existential questions: what is the problem? what are the alternatives? what do you recommend?

“These flash mobs pose no threat to the elites unless they build disciplined organization structures, which takes years, and articulate a vision of what can come next. (This is why I support Extinction Rebellion, which has a large grassroots network, especially in Europe, carries out effective sustained acts of civil disobedience and has a clearly stated goal of overthrowing the ruling elites and building a new governing system through people’s committees and sortition.)”—Chris Hedges

“Chris Hedges: Bandaging the Corpse,” by Chris Hedges, CONSORTIUM NEWS, https://consortiumnews.com/2021/03/12/chris-hedges-bandaging-the-corpse/?fbclid=IwAR1zir4tDK9XWwpmsm5O9zPUPEZDu3Nvy95bGVzD0tozAhSXePIDInaTDJc.

March 13

Another interesting and probably true story by Eve Ottenberg.

“Leaving Afghanistan by May 1? Alas, Not Likely,” by Eve Ottenberg, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/12/leaving-afghanistan-by-may-1-alas-not-likely/?fbclid=IwAR2mJ46rx_Yt1tjfRDyeBT2NQm3cILidXQhz3nNJVop95fvK167vIxaCgzw.

March 13

A gruesome tale by Charles Hugh Smith

“The Cannibalization Is Complete: Only Inedible Zombies Remain,” by Charles Hugh Smith, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/rabobank-inflation-being-hidden-because-belief-our-whole-fantasy-system-collapsing?fbclid=IwAR3QYul0YBTsN-jHjiF4eoMfo2wVspe2nej5SaKNUTW9iJAZKB5Cw_llPoo.

March 12

Read at your own risk

“Rabobank: Inflation is Being ‘Hidden’ Because Belief in Our Whole Fantasy System is Collapsing,” by Michael Every of Rabobank, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/rabobank-inflation-being-hidden-because-belief-our-whole-fantasy-system-collapsing?fbclid=IwAR3QYul0YBTsN-jHjiF4eoMfo2wVspe2nej5SaKNUTW9iJAZKB5Cw_llPoo.

March 11

Yep

“Economic Growth is the Cause of Climate Change, Not the Solution to it,” by Rob Urie, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/05/economic-growth-is-the-cause-of-climate-change-not-the-solution-to-it/?fbclid=IwAR1UzBoMjlua2J_vj6z-7kT9scmraz0zkLVM03rxqLjvON9jo8F90fjJKfE.

March 11

Straight talk about where USians are

“The Republican War on America,” by Evaggelos Vallianatos, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/10/the-republican-war-on-america/?fbclid=IwAR2aabkes8grRL1hybFHlBrORDYhayOkzikSMO-ZB9ElyyooHH5JofFEqqA.

March 10

Here’s an old style windmill with Texas flag colors painted on the windvane. We had a wooden windmill like this on our farm in 1944. We used to sell sucker rods for such windmills in our lumber yard, Stapleton Lumber Company, at Wolfforth, Texas. Wind was a significant power source for drinking water for cattle and people in Northwest Texas in the 1930s, 40s, and 50s.

“Wind Power Is A Disaster In Texas, No Matter What Paul Krugman Says,” by Robert Murphy via The Mises Institute, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wind-power-disaster-texas-no-matter-what-paul-krugman-says?fbclid=IwAR1mybn-i10Ux0aqHlif1j5VK8V3Penh28vPjhGxKgpO4TJvoDjTfPGqaVs.

March 10

Yuk

“Fears Of A ‘Return Of The 1930s Dust Bowl’ Rise As Record Drought Sizzzles Southwest,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/weather/record-drought-sizzles-southwest-fears-return-1930s-dust-bowl?fbclid=IwAR3hYwhLC0oqXB19FRqBTem4vn6HDEFhpLYm0ZUfU25kRKfTQgnzmxcoc2s.

March 10

Yes, of course

“Abolish the Filibuster Now,” by William Rivers Pitt, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/abolish-the-filibuster-now/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR0T_JS5cKX-Qp6UIIw4wM_xjCluWMYSxNostCIQayOJwDVWEJ8Ahd51utc.

March 9

Pathetic

“Georgia Senate votes to eliminate no-excuse absentee voting,” by Mark Niesse and David Wickert, THE ATLANTA JOURNAL-CONSTITUTION, https://truthout.org/articles/abolish-the-filibuster-now/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR0T_JS5cKX-Qp6UIIw4wM_xjCluWMYSxNostCIQayOJwDVWEJ8Ahd51utc.

March 7

“They should have insisted on calling witnesses when they had the chance no matter the risks or how long it took. Nothing was more important than doing everything Dems could to convict Trump in the eyes of all Earthian humans, to send a permanent powerful message proving that democratic consensual truth can rule when threatened and confronted by the lies, machinations, violence, and crime of gangs.

“In this case two hundred or so of the gang members will be punished with fines and jail time for their crimes, but the gang leader got away with his crimes scot-free, thanks to 43 Repugnant Senators voting to acquit, of 100 Dem and Repub senators voting. Seven non-repugnant Republicans voted to convict.”

“The Exemplary USIAN Impeachment Trial of 2021 Morphed into a Tragedy of Wrongdoing,” by Richard John Stapleton, EFFECTIVE LEARNING REPORT, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-exemplary-impeachment-trial-became-a-tragic-event/?fbclid=IwAR1bHQmo8Nw0C0clIZdLLdlezaZhjoIdy2BZTIwlOY91n8RCg0zQT23L8vc.

March 7

Hell of a note. Damned if you do and damned if you don’t. Destroy Earthian human life if you go to nuclear war or destroy the USian economy if you declare peace, lay down your arms, and cooperate.

“Full-Spectrum Extinction,” by Paul Atwood, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/05/full-spectrum-extinction/?fbclid=IwAR1qfawU2BQThNXExkDe1UXjkp1c3rtwUDz2Vs4J6aTw-4xpoTCjHPbvowg.

March 7

Excellent video embedded, a must watch and listen to summary of the situation in Syria. Tulsi Gabbard won the early 2020 Dem primary debates according to Drudge Report polls as I documented in the Effective Learning Report. Now she is no longer in the USian congress.

“Tulsi Gabbard Calls Out The US Dirty War on Syria That Biden & Aides Admit To,” by Aaron Mate at The Grayzone, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/tulsi-gabbard-calls-out-us-dirty-war-syria-biden-aides-admit?fbclid=IwAR3Xst49kVPY6jbmfPkUEtqQd4-HJCCUUwEfKg4XATushK3ARdkYl57MrEQ.

March 7

Say it aint so Joe

“Kroger Opens Fully-Automated Ohio Fulfillment Center As Fears Mount Of Rising Technological Unemployment,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/kroger-opens-fully-automated-ohio-fulfillment-center-fears-mount-rising-technological?fbclid=IwAR1M6inodZZIu6DjN2EtB_-tAfuXGMIRICw7IwBumaZFHftykKByk09Cv5g.

March 6

A good history lesson

“March 5, 1857: Dred (and Harriett) Scott Decision,” ZINN EDUCATION PROJECT, https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/tdih/dred-harriet-scott-decision/?fbclid=IwAR390Uijp0GEvoTUs0SnAhHZIxtvVDuNF1Ky3FnvBJK-8-pGvIT9vxTIiYE.

March 6

Because Georgia elected Warnock and Ossoft

“Senate Passes $1.9 Trillion Coronavirus Relief Package,” by Chloee Weiner, NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO/GEORGIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING, https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/03/06/973126199/senate-passes-1-9-trillion-coronavirus-relief-package?utm_campaign=storyshare&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&fbclid=IwAR2FHHjGKZRvpflakjpqcC1kjZX5ef5IJabkBmOwOqWFCn84rIcLC9p74BQ

March 5

Is it we have not had inflation yet because most people have gotten poorer and poorer and thus unable to bid up the price of goods?

“One Bank Turns Apocalyptic: ‘The Fed Will Inevitably Move to YCC’ As ‘Rates Are No Longer Anchored’,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/one-bank-turn-apocalyptic-fed-will-inevitably-move-ycc-rates-are-no-longer-anchored?fbclid=IwAR2sn_YeGm9ImKZEBm1wxOWMXOpLcicRViToK17mG7Mgats_z5gcY863Nfo.

March 5

Dogs having fun

“Pure happiness,” by Chitra Basarkar, Video, RJS Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/richard.stapleton.397.

March 4

Without a doubt

“The Pentagon, First, Last, and Always,” by Mandy Smithberger, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/04/the-pentagon-first-last-and-always/?fbclid=IwAR3PFmnElPY0tuoqSd3niQnR52ZxqVhpTMYuthOa3XBlxtLkf7_7XTzrCDA.

March 4

Yuk. Just like I thought. Why oh why didn’t they elect Bernie in the 2020 Dem primaries?

“Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas Knapp, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/04/bidens-foreign-policy-no-joy-in-mudville/?fbclid=IwAR3OLJU7nHFne1Q8ukoX0CEnWaUgoB_dy7et83-28xFhkxM-00_w4ya3kzI.

March 4

Neoliberalism not the way to go, as I have said before

“Skeletons in the Neoliberal Cupboard,” by Thomas Klikauer and Norman Simms, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/04/skeletons-in-the-neoliberal-cupboard/?fbclid=IwAR1BOgHrI_fybhc-sjuW5r-xvZWjg0zIirbdOmqWcg4cAliVsZAGJXg4Qg8.

March 4

Caving to the Pentagon or just a war mongerer on his own?

“Senators Move to Repeal Some Presidential War Powers After Airstrikes in Syria,” by Jessica Corbett, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/senators-move-to-repeal-some-presidential-war-powers-after-airstrikes-in-syria/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR1p3VbOmE4QTT4pMSe3lSaw9CgIo2zKCieVd4K4nqalIbkdg5X-7mQlSLc.

March 4

How bad can it get?

“Louisiana Hunger Strikers—Already in Solitary—Are Being Brutally Punished,” by Frances Madeson, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/louisiana-hunger-strikers-already-in-solitary-are-being-brutally-punished/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR1rbdG5XdLbVMj4M3p04zt4HrYPNIqpyP-CdBSQyk9_5vaaLEf_iQ9lNb4.

March 4

This exemplifies what’s wrong with the US government. Rules are passed to favor political parties and persons not to cause efficiency and effectiveness of operations. This penchant for rule-making has turned the process of USian government into a process of Game-playing, rewarding connivers and manipulators, Adapted Child and Critical Parent people, who enjoy adapting to and using petty rules and playing psychological Games, such as NIGYSOB, Now I’ve Got You, You SOB, fostering constant competition and conflict, requiring I’m OK — You’re Not OK life positions to function, almost obliterating Adult ego state objectivity performing their duties, causing an incredible waste of time, energy, and money to get anything done resulting in real improvement for we the people of the US or citizens of Spaceship Earth. As shown in the embedded photo in this article what congress people need to do is use a Classroom De-Gamer™ I invented to randomly select members of committees and leaders of the moment to start Adult discussions of relevant issues, a Congressional De-Gamer to cut down on psychological Game playing that is almost destroying the functioning of congress. All you have to do is spin the spinner. The process is known as sortition. Ancient Greeks used it to create real democracy for free citizens.

“The Exemplary USIAN Impeachment Trial of 2020 Morphed into a Tragedy of Wrongdoing,” by Richard John Stapleton, EFFECTIVE LEARNING REPORT, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-exemplary-impeachment-trial-became-a-tragic-event/?fbclid=IwAR3e4T75pZcHRam70WMVhikDvk1T6weryRkTannKgWosQjFLa3KU3kRU0hk.

March 4

A fine kettle of fish

“Fed Has Left Us With A Bond Market That’s ‘All But Destroyed’,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/jim-grant-fed-has-left-us-bond-market-thats-all-destroyed?fbclid=IwAR0lMglSAdbTrjqfNk5g_SA5gHqJmFLpoJP8KslJpV60kBGea1gRtWXmRbA.

March 3

Right. If you are worth something only if you are working for some sort of boss for wages or a salary what sort of world is this?


Mike Rowe: Everyone is Essential,” by John Stossel, PJMEDIA,
https://pjmedia.com/columns/john-stossel/2021/03/03/mike-rowe-everyone-is-essential-n1429583?fbclid=IwAR07yFQZNG6PySKy3-5lu7BHOyDVMOFlRwHfPPRAbZL3bWwPHg7gaRPxKis.

March 3

In my estimation there is greater than a .50 probability Biden will cave to the Pentagon more than Trump did.

“Biden’s Quandary: Proxy Wars and Endless Wars,” by Melvin Goodman, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/03/03/bidens-quandry-proxy-wars-and-endless-wars/?fbclid=IwAR2YCokMEz1p-C7_vUi6cUSCPQDS1mUIqjgeG9ft-jJObIHjL-BPOso_7wE.

March 3

Aint no fairness in the world

“Latinx Farmworkers Risking Their Lives During COVID Struggle to Access Vaccines,” by Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/video/latinx-farmworkers-risking-their-lives-during-covid-struggle-to-access-vaccines/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR3qHR5KlAmmHOS5KJ_i7FiFfu7k64olnri8miAuUf8zxAATgCC67WnrN1g.

March 3

Goes without sayin’

“To Renew Our Democracy, We Need to Tax the Ultrarich,” by Madeleine Johnsson, Inequality.org, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/to-renew-our-democracy-we-need-to-tax-the-ultrarich/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR0UZVRidFH-H3DRpHG1vP-VINgg3D2lOO9rSh9RFi3agE766BEqKZGNFV8.

March 2

And so it goes. Ralph Nader asks a very relevant question.

“Why Didn’t Speaker Pelosi Want Witnesses?,” by Ralph Nader, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/22/why-didnt-speaker-pelosi-want-witnesses/?fbclid=IwAR2cTnOKwoxpdwWU–YILyoxtUTMozP_t9yrvFol8nEA6gAXdWs_TkhgSJ0.

March 1, 2021

How complicated it is. Paul Street speaks at length. and maybe on the mark. We’re in deep doo-doo, no doubt about that.

“The Anatomy of Fascism Denial,” by Paul Street, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/28/the-anatomy-of-fascism-denial-2/?fbclid=IwAR3sA0axHcePQJxhGQW7w4B6V-JYW8TfuMHlEKOjQ-DIAUS_7_F4LLqoJA8.

March 1  

If citizens of France can imprison a former president why can’t USians?

“Former French President Nicolas Sarkozy Sentenced to Prison in Humiliating Corruption Conviction,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/political/former-french-president-nicolas-sarkozy-sentenced-prison-humiliating-corruption?fbclid=IwAR1zPkjpairIFQiHfhPaovYwXvqBWknlEfr08FvhS_Kr5E4yn5U3m_9UWxM.

February 27

Amen. It’s even worse conspicuous consumption than what went on during the Gilded Age. We’re living in an age of capitalism run amok enriching the rich at increasing rates, largely caused by computers and artificial intelligence. We need to find a way to make sure computers and artificial intelligence work for all humans not just those owning the copyrights and patents for computers and artificial intelligence programs.

“We Need Democracy, Not Billionaire Philanthropy,” by Jill Richardson, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/26/we-need-democracy-not-billionaire-philanthropy/?fbclid=IwAR11rAp6381tLwe1FUPo_eSsUtXt1g8V_jUN8PjNsc2waDFgicJSmeFRHDY.

February 27

As reality sets in

“’America is Back’: Make the Best of It,” by Andrew Levine, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/26/america-is-back-make-the-best-of-it/?fbclid=IwAR0UZVRidFH-H3DRpHG1vP-VINgg3D2lOO9rSh9RFi3agE766BEqKZGNFV8.

February 27

Whoopee. The deep state is back.

“Joe Biden’s US Foreign Policy: Return to the Old Normal,” by Roger Harris, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/26/america-is-back-joe-bidens-us-foreign-policy/?fbclid=IwAR3qHR5KlAmmHOS5KJ_i7FiFfu7k64olnri8miAuUf8zxAATgCC67WnrN1g.

February 27

Without one shred of factual tangible evidence he did win. Unbelievable. How can anyone lie like this with a straight face over and over again.

“Two-Thirds of GOP Voters Still Buy Into False Claims of Election Fraud,” by Chris Walker, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/two-thirds-of-gop-voters-still-buy-into-false-claims-of-election-fraud/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR3-d92or5lMlZJ8YX7URvq-IJX6Aad9kuL92dWjHguRXdSDCz9BRRomJUQ.

February 27

Thank goodness the US is not Burma.

“Factory Workers in Burma Are Resisting the Military Coup With Strikes,” by Kevin Lin, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/factory-workers-in-burma-are-resisting-the-military-coup-with-strikes/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR3CeXAG5ge1Ahi7dbbCPEXUpoPI2Ngm2vfBv3Yb3msVepv9ISLPZvWXmtg.

February 27

Oh, the joys of being a billionaire while serving, eating, and drinking hamburgers and coke.

“’Eventually, The Party Ends’ – Buffett Releases Annual Letter, Repurchases Record $25BN in BRK Stock,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/never-bet-against-america-warren-buffett-releases-annual-letter-berkshire-hathaway?fbclid=IwAR10GS0tJupbM4tCmhuMrrE5DjTV4WI7m4nZ_3Y3306_Rzd6z1RV5XYmw4Q.

February 27

Here we go again with neoliberal policies back in force.

“’Letting a Murderer Walk’: Leading Dems Outraged MbS Gets ‘Free Pass’ From Biden,” by Tyler Durden, ZEROHEDGE, https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/leading-dems-outraged-mbs-will-get-free-pass-biden-despite-intel-findings?fbclid=IwAR2yMvoa2eDl6ml3P3eRCzVxDZWS9XYNyPFB73oJzwDfA2FBMiC3qV48FAo.

February 27

Crimea has always been basically Russian as I understand it. Why antagonize the Russian govt over this? To justify keeping US and NATO troops and bases in the region? What right does Biden have to decree that USians will never accept something?

“Biden Says US will ‘Never’ Accept Russia’s Annexation of Crimea,” by Dave DeCamp, ANTIWAR.COM, https://news.antiwar.com/2021/02/26/biden-says-us-will-never-accept-russias-annexation-of-crimea/?fbclid=IwAR3UV9xI8-GShokjxpInwTJ7febaJpVLNPbL98WQ4vB2wC-5ZBx6qauH-_M.

February 26

How much was wasted on this? $1.5 trillion? Think what that could have bought for good causes.

“The U.S. Air Force Just Admitted The F-35 Stealth Fighter Has Failed, by David Axe, FORBES, https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2021/02/23/the-us-air-force-just-admitted-the-f-35-stealth-fighter-has-failed/?fbclid=IwAR0B7-Q4DYxNgAW48taPNjbuLvhlAGLyY_kyLSeV85AhGo__-pYyOafQ1F8&sh=579823a31b16.

February 25

Corruption of the highest order. Trump was the highest paid non-professional golfer in history, paying himself to play golf with federal money on his own golf courses, over one hundred million dollars over four years. Nice work if you can get it. He did not “make” $1.6 billion while he was president. that was gross revenue generated by all his vanity enterprises, hotels, golf courses, etc., some of it not generated by himself counted as expenses to be paid with his govt expense acct. No individual can really “make” money. only the federal reserve and banks can do that, by punching digits into their computers and calling the resulting numbers they loan out money, whether loaned to the fed govt, corporations, or individuals.

“A large portion of the former president’s Trump Organization revenue came from properties that he would often visit during his presidency, according to the report. Mar-a-Lago, the Trump hotel in D.C. and his golf courses in New Jersey, Florida and D.C. were responsible for over $620 million in revenue for Trump while he was in office, and he visited those properties a combined 399 times, says CREW. In all, Trump visited his properties 547 times over his presidency, CREW found in another report.”

Do you think he did not do any sort of work, make decisions, etc., managing those properties on those visits? If so think again. Being president in the White House was a part-time job for him, counting the time he spent entertaining his “rallies” and making tweets, and visiting his properties and playing golf.

“Trump Salary Donation Was Only 0.1 Percent of the $1.6 Billion He Reported Making While President,” by Sharon Zhang, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/trump-salary-donation-was-0-1-percent-of-reported-1-6-billion-he-made-in-office/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR1ndJygYblBgMK9hmaWB_AvUKK_6qlfg7APzTh_IoYcHgk4kUXdXRj7Ia0.

February 24

Will Biden become a bigger and better war-mongerer with NATO than Trump, Obama, Bush II, Clinton, or Bush I did with NATO? Is NATO and the US the biggest threat to Earthian peace? Ostensibly doing what they do to control oil supplies and other Earthian resources for their chosen people?

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/32120

February 23

Well done article

“Yemen: The bigger lie,” by Gwynne Dyer, HURRIYET DAILY NEWS, https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/opinion/gwynne-dyer/yemen-the-bigger-lie-138280?fbclid=IwAR1PYuxsC1CcNCSSqJeiTH4f_ivzgqVsXvYrCq2TlDqhOJIWyXTQlb-tvhI.

February 23

Agree

“It will take more than dumping Trump to stop the neo-fascists,” by John Wojcik, INTREPID REPORT, http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/32095.

February 22

Let’s hope not

“The Trumps Have Fueled a Far Right Media Monster That Is Not Going Away,” by Mike Ludwig, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/the-trumps-have-fueled-a-far-right-media-monster-that-is-not-going-away/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR1PYuxsC1CcNCSSqJeiTH4f_ivzgqVsXvYrCq2TlDqhOJIWyXTQlb-tvhI.

February 22

Abolition as World-Making

“At the heart of each of these approaches is a commitment to building community safety and well-being by strengthening capacity for solidarity and standing up to/dismantling white supremacist violence in its many social, cultural, political and economic guises. The transformative power of abolition doesn’t pass the buck to someone else to “take care of things.” It asks us to create the world in which we want to live without relying on white supremacist, patriarchal, heterosexist and ableist structures of violence, exploitation and greed to triage the worthiness of anyone.”

“Jail Won’t Solve White Supremacist Violence. Here’s How to Truly Confront It,” by Kay Whitlock, TRUTHOUT, https://truthout.org/articles/jail-wont-solve-white-supremacist-violence-heres-how-to-truly-confront-it/?utm_campaign=Truthout%20Share%20Buttons&fbclid=IwAR1PYuxsC1CcNCSSqJeiTH4f_ivzgqVsXvYrCq2TlDqhOJIWyXTQlb-tvhI.

February 22

Agree. What is needed is more face-to-face dialectical discussion among people from all walks of life about existential questions, especially in the halls of congress: what is the problem? what are the alternatives? what do you recommend?

“Education won’t stop conspiracy theories,” by Jill Richardson, INTREPREPID REPORT, http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/32085.

February 21

Convicting Trump would have led to his disqualification from ever again holding a USian political office, and this vampire-like MAGA fascist Nazi authoritarian fantasy of his would have figuratively had a wooden stake driven through its sadistic heart. But, alas, his fantasy can now rise again with him as its supreme gang leader, thanks to 43 Not-OK Repug gang members voting to Rescue him in his impeachment trial.

What are grade school teachers supposed to tell their students about this in history lessons?

https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-exemplary…/…

“No compromising with the GOP cult,” by Robert Reich, INTREPID REPORT, http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/32058.

February 17

Don’t get me wrong. I am not a Marxist, but I do have a degree in economics and I studied Marx’s writings in a history of economic thought course. While I disagree with Marxist thinking less now than I did then for sure I do not advocate any sort of communist revolution. Unfortunately Marx or no Marx there is no doubt that capitalism has not worked for most humans in recent decades, especially in the US where lower and middle income humans have gotten poorer and the rich have gotten richer at an increasing rate, which is a major cause of the social and political unrest and violence USians are experiencing now. Here is what I have been advocating for dealing with Earthian economic, social, and political problems and plights for some time now, in my essays “FreeFairProgressParty” at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/freefairprogressparty/ and “The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.” at https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-evolution-of…/

“Capitalism is unfolding exactly as Karl Marx predicted,” by Olivia Goldhill, QUARTZ, https://qz.com/1269525/capitalism-is-unfolding-exactly-as-karl-marx-predicted/?fbclid=IwAR38JlBNEZRl6EtkrLsUigDTbkrBElzCkZPrD4A28I6G7QdVzoifuzyVGfY.

February 16

Agree

“Pope Francis declares evolution and Big Bang theory are real and God is not a ‘magician with a magic wand’,” by Alan Withnail, THE INDEPENDENT, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/pope-francis-declares-evolution-and-big-bang-theory-are-right-and-god-isn-t-magician-magic-wand-9822514.html?fbclid=IwAR3ylNM0p3MM3NTxy_topaMRyJOuTTtyZFrM9udlU62E0jb5yTrcRj0Vrkk.

February 13

Rejected by dim Dems in the 2020 presidential primaries, Bernie is now still hard at work as a senator getting thing’s done for working people. What a pity he’s not now president.

“Bernie on the Budget Committee,” by Eve Ottenberg, COUNTERPUNCH, https://www.counterpunch.org/2021/02/12/bernie-on-the-budget-committee/?fbclid=IwAR1DLxSJJyXtRxay5ZJvcFbYKB_zJekl_yx8PYFdIH3oinuTfiOFRFHedPU.

February 11

Loser-survivors

“A majority of the people arrested for Capitol riot had a history of financial trouble,” by Todd Frankel, MSN NEWS, https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-majority-of-the-people-arrested-for-capitol-riot-had-a-history-of-financial-trouble/ar-BB1dyUcH?fbclid=IwAR3o4m4xJ_xflj79lDovpcNvpy53gu93n_vO5qnQ7YS9SXRaFRU1NH5mhaI.

February 8

Rout Logger’s Group: To Save Earthian Civilization is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered for sale to the public.

“Rout Logger’s Group: To Save Earthian Civilization, Internet Episode Six,” by Richard John Stapleton, EFFECTIVE LEARNING REPORT, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-six/?fbclid=IwAR0dCQWRAKMIBMw-uqWt8EZZ_3TVXU7CifKys7BkaLnz_kdRPcaA_StERy0.

 

TRANSACTIONAL ANALYSIS TUTORING

Here’s a way you can learn at low cost how you can improve your performance and increase your satisfaction dealing with others in humane relationships.

Transactional analysis is a process of self-discipline, sometimes called verbate, the verbal art of self-defense, a set of concepts and tools you can use to help defend yourself, and others, from stress or loss in interpersonal states of affairs.

Humans transact with one another to get their psychological, social, and economic needs met using ego states. The first thing to learn in a TA tutoring session is what ego states are so you can recognize them in transactional episodes. Then learn how to use ego states and different kinds of transactions to increase your chances of participating in transactional episodes that build confidence and self-esteem that lead to success and satisfaction.

This process entails learning what psychological Games are and how to recognize them, and learning about different ways of structuring time.

For TA tutoring contact Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, an educational and organizational specialist in transactional analysis certified by the International Transactional Analysis Association.

Richard is a founder and owner of Effective Learning company, at https://www.effectivelearning.net/. For more detail regarding his TA experience showing how he applied transactional analysis as a consultant and tutor see his “RJS Academic Vita” at https://.effectivelearning.net/rjs-academic-vita.html.

Tutoring fee: $50 per hour, at Effective Learning Company, 32 East Main Street, Statesboro, Georgia. Masks and social distancing are required.

SUGGESTED READING: Born to Learn: A Transactional Analysis of Human Learning, by Richard John Stapleton at https://www.amazon.com/Born-Learn-Transactional-Analysis-Learing/dp/0692584331#ace-g9859629705.

The transactional analysis tutoring fee is fractional: One-half hour, $25; fifteen minutes $12.50; etc. Present questions in your first tutoring session after reading Born to Learn to get specific tutoring about anything in the book. Most tutorees can gain a working knowledge of TA in one hour of tutoring.

Satisfaction guaranteed: If you don’t think TA will work for you after your first tutoring session you owe nothing for the tutoring.

The Exemplary USIAN Impeachment Trial OF 2021 Morphed into a Tragedy of Wrongdoing

By RICHARD JOHN STAPLETON

I agree with Ralph Nader and Bruce Fein in their opinion.

The Impeachment Managers, especially Jamie Raskin, made excellent presentations to the full Senate, clearly and logically building and analyzing their case; but a few cowardly dim Dems made a poor call in the final minutes of the Game behind closed doors, which cost Dems the Game, assuming they really wanted to win, once again selling progressive Dems down the river.

They should have insisted on calling witnesses when they had the chance no matter the risks or how long it took. Nothing was more important than doing everything Dems could to convict Trump in the eyes of all Earthian humans, to send a permanent powerful message proving that democratic consensual truth can rule when threatened and confronted by the lies, machinations, violence, and crime of gangs.

In this case two hundred or so of the gang members will be punished with fines and jail time for their crimes, but the gang leader got away with his crimes scot-free, thanks to 43 Repugnant Senators voting to acquit, of 100 Dem and Repub senators voting. Seven non-repugnant Republicans voted to convict.

Most of the 43 Repugs voting to acquit did so because they thought it would help them get reelected, and/or they were afraid of violence or sanctions against them emanating from their own voters back home, or from Trump himself. They were cowards afraid of being considered a traitor to the Repug gang and cause. So they made themselves traitors to truthful law-abiding humans everywhere by voting to acquit. Repug senators now resemble gang leaders and members more than they do truthful law-abiding citizens.

In this case democratic consensual truth was overridden by yet one more arbitrary Senate rule, that required a sixty percent majority vote to convict a president in an impeachment trial. Why not require a seventy percent majority? Or just a simple majority? It’s as if US senators through time have tried to minimize real democracy in the senate by adopting arbitrary petty unfair rules.

This is not rule by constitutional law; it’s rule by whim and conniving capricious Game-playing, designed to protect the vested interests of political parties, senators, representatives, and presidents who want to keep their jobs. I was taught in history lessons back in grade school that “our wonderful American democracy” was supposed to be governed by elected citizen representatives who would go to Washington for a few years to use their common sense to vote their consciences on various issues and then go back home to live happily ever after managing their farms and businesses. I never dreamed back then that most of them would want to hang out in Washington for a living the rest of their lives.

This exemplifies what’s wrong with the US government. Rules are passed to favor political parties and persons not to cause efficiency and effectiveness of operations. This penchant for rule-making has turned the process of USian government into a process of Game-playing, rewarding connivers and manipulators, Adapted Child and Critical Parent people, who enjoy adapting to and using petty rules and playing psychological Games, such as NIGYSOB, Now I’ve Got You, You SOB, fostering constant competition and conflict, requiring I’m OK — You’re Not OK life positions to function, almost obliterating Adult ego state objectivity performing their duties, causing an incredible waste of time, energy, and money to get anything done resulting in real improvement for we the people of the US or citizens of Spaceship Earth.

As this televised invasion and Impeachment Trial made clear and obvious, tremendous energy is required to get anything done in Washington because the rules of the Game have been rigged in all sorts of ways to protect the vested interests of various individuals, groups, and organizations, almost destroying real democracy in governmental operations. Consequently what is needed in the US Congress is something that will eliminate most of their arbitrary petty rules and master-servant processes that limit real democracy. Rather than waste time trying to rig committees and elections to give various members unequal power, such as the obscene unfair power possessed by the villainous and treacherous Mitchel McConnell as the Senate “majority” leader, the now-“minority” leader, what they need to do is use a Classroom De-Gamer™ I invented such as the one demonstrated above. Give each member of Congress a number, and when openings on necessary committees arise or discussions of bills need to be conducted spin the spinner and select new committee members or a member to start a discussion in a group, wherein all members have an equal chance to say what they think about problems, alternatives, and recommendations, using their common sense, after the randomly-selected De-Gamer-selected leader of the day decides to stop talking. That would create real democracy and eliminate most of the psychological Game-playing that wastes untold time, money, and energy day in and day out managing states of affairs of the US Government, which are now in considerable disarray considering all branches around Spaceship Earth.

Based on what I saw and heard on TV in shots of halls, offices, and other rooms in the Capitol Building, and in commentary, watching the insurrection and the impeachment trial start, escalate, and play out, it seems to me today’s senators and representatives plodding about in and occupying the halls, offices, restaurants, pubs, gyms, beauty shops, and other rooms of the Capitol Building ought to enjoy their habitation and its amenities and perks, catered to by hundreds of excellent well-trained servants. The architecture, paintings and other art objects, overall decor, and intricate details of the building are exquisite and awe-inspiring. Several people on TV during the invasion and impeachment trial remarked about how easy it is to get lost in the Capitol Building, containing hallways heading in various directions at various angles, secret rooms and what have you, in a linked labyrinth. It’s no wonder gang leaders needed to take reconnaissance tours of the place allegedly led by senators or representatives the day before the invasion in order to be able to find specific senators and representatives they wanted to capture, once they broke into the building. One capitol policeman was clever enough to trick invaders into following him down a wrong hallway instead of knocking down a door where the invaders were, behind which several congresspeople were hiding. It’s likely the anger of the loser-survivor gang invaders of January 6, 2021 was to some extent caused by envy they felt for winner-survivor congresspeople.

Mark Twain in his time said the US Congress was the largest criminal class in the world. Many of the January 6 gang invaders thought much the same about today’s Congress members, having been primed to hate them by their supreme gang leader, former president Trump. On the bright side, senators and representatives might now have less concern than they did about getting reelected, since they now know violent gangs can break into the Capitol Building in broad daylight. They might now think running a boring farm or business back home might not be so bad after all.

I also agree with this article, “The Capitol Siege Was White Supremacy in Action. Trial Evidence Confirms That,” by George Yancy.

Mainstream TV media generally lied by omission about this white supremacy issue during the invasion during the early stages. I told my wife I have yet to see a single non-white face in the crowd, but they’re not saying anything about it. It’s also interesting that some of the violent white gang members had no compunction about chanting and saying they wanted to do serious harm to white congresspeople, especially Nancy Pelosi and Mike Pence, by violent means, including gunfire and hanging. In some ways they resembled a very large lynch mob.

I watched the whole thing, both the insurrection and the trial, on MSNBC, occasionally switching to Fox So-Called News to see what kind of picture they were painting of the invasion and trial for their audience. At times the events were riveting and horrifying; at times the presentations were inspiring and exhilarating, watching the good guys; at times they were disgusting, watching and listening to the bad guys, Trump’s dissembling lightweight lawyers; but the whole psychological Game was sickening and depressing in the end, like watching your team lose an extended days-long Superbowl game by deliberately fumbling the ball on the one yard line as time ran out.

MSNBC did a good job technically showing the Game in real time, the greatest show aboard Spaceship Earth at the time, a massive panoramic extravaganza started, promoted, partially orchestrated, and starred in by one of the biggest con artists of all time, reality-show star Donald T. Trump, surpassing by far the circuses of P.T. Barnum & Bailey. Maybe Trump really is a “stable genius”, a strange and evil genius, a pantomime clown with the vocabulary of a sixth-grader.

This was the sickest part: “McConnell Says Trump ‘Responsible for Provoking’ Attack, After Voting to Acquit; Trump Says MAGA ‘Has Just Begun’.”  

Trump also possesses magical Houdini-like skills extricating himself from seemingly hopeless predicaments, and so far he’s been lucky. McConnell and the other 42 Repug senators voting to acquit and Rescue Trump, despite the facts of the case that were clearly and professionally presented and explained by the very competent House Impeachment Managers, proving beyond a reasonable doubt Trump incited an insurrection against the US government, won the Game for Trump at the end with their 43 acquittal votes, thereby insulting human common sense and decency in a display of greedy, thuggish, disingenuous, despicable, cowardly human behavior, which, thanks to an arbitrary rule requiring a 60 percent Senate majority to convict a US president in an impeachment trial, can now result in disastrous consequences for all USian citizens, possibly anarchy and civil war, leading to military states of affairs in the US resembling states of affairs happening in the Middle East and North Africa in the last seventeen years, with war lords and gangs roaming about the country conquering and controlling whatever they can as long as they can.

If so, hopefully the USian military will be more successful fighting a “war on terror” inside the US than it has been fighting a War on Terror outside the US.

Since January 6 internal agitations between political gangs and between political gang leaders and political gang members in the US now resemble more and more the internal agitations of war-torn Game-playing countries in the Middle East and North Africa, aided and abetted in some cases by the Game-playing USian government and its military forces, ostensibly to spread and preserve “democracy” around Spaceship Earth, to control oil supplies for chosen people in NATO countries and elsewhere, and to preserve faith in the “American” dollar as the Earthian reserve currency in international trade.

Regardless of what common sense might tell you, a 57 percent majority of the US Senate voting to convict Trump was not good enough to really convict him. Trump was three votes away from conviction, a very narrow Houdini-like escape from his much-deserved condemnation.

Convicting Trump would have led to his disqualification from ever again holding a USian political office, and his personal vampire-like MAGA fascist gang in the US, containing probably at least thirty million true-believer loser-survivor followers, would have figuratively had a wooden stake driven through its hard heart. Instead, tragically, because 43 Not-OK Repug gang members and leaders in the US senate Rescued Trump with their acquittal votes to win the psychological Game, Trump and his gang members can now continue to threaten, harass, and recruit Victims inside the US, as they try once again to install an authoritarian fascist regime in the US, with Trump as president in 2024, depending on the verdicts of civil and criminal trials Trump faces in the meantime. May the 43 Repug senators voting to acquit Trump, thereby Rescuing him in this monstrous psychological Game, live in infamy for their flagrant discounting of facts, common sense, consensual truth, and human dignity.

What are grade school teachers supposed to tell their students about this psychological Game in Usian history lessons?

_______________________________

Richard John Stapleton, PhD, CTA, certified transactional analyst, educator, octogenarian emeritus professor of management, writer, editor and publisher at Effective Learning Company.

If you wish to make a comment about this article please scroll to the RESPONSES option at the top of this page included on the masthead of this blog and make your comment there.

ROUT LOGGER’S GROUP: TO SAVE EARTHIAN CIVILIZATION — INTERNET EPISODE SIX

By RICHARD JOHN STAPLETON

Rout Logger’s Group: To Save Earthian Civilization is a work in progress. While settings, plots, theories, objects, and narratives in this novel may be loosely analogous to the same that have happened in various realities, the names, actions, and attributions of characters cast herein are fictional. All parts of this novel will be published in the Effective Learning Report at various intervals on the Internet, subject to revision at any time, hopefully culminating in a final print edition offered for sale to the public.

Copyright 2020 by Effective Learning Publications. All rights reserved. No part of this novel may be copied or printed on paper without permission. Share on the Internet as you wish.

To refresh yourself about what happened in earlier episodes, go to the following website addresses:

Internet Episode 1, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-part-1/.   

Internet Episode 2, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-2/.

Internet Episode 3, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-three/.

Internet Episode 4, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-episode-four/.

Internet Episode 5, https://blog.effectivelearning.net/the-group-to-save-spaceship-earth-internet-episode-five/.

A list of names of forty cast members with a short biographical blurb about each is presented in Internet Episode 1.

INTERNET EPISODE SIX

SESSION FOUR

FEBRUARY 2020

DALLAS, TEXAS

The Truther Selected Martin as the rooster crowed

Martin—Here we are in the Heart of Texas, or should I say in the heart of Texas traffic.  I don’t think I have ever seen such a tangled mess of traffic in my life, cloverleaf intersections and entrances and exits everywhere.  I’m lucky I took a cab in from the airport.  I can’t imagine how anyone could learn to get around in this mess of highway mazes.  I never realized Dallas was as large a city as it is.  On the other hand, once you get into the hotel, it’s like we are home again.  One central city hotel is about like another. 

As a religious studies professor it seems to me the biggest problem right now is people not having a firm set of anything they can believe in, something to put their faith in, not knowing whether there really is a god, and if so, what kind of god. It seems to me the alternative prescriptions are all authoritarian, dogmatic and doctrinaire, telling people not to question what the bible says. On the other hand, can humans develop some sort of non-authoritarian god , a non-anthropomorphic god, with no human characteristics, that does not care for anyone personally or human relationships, who merely creates certain scientific principles and phenomena, such as what we can see, hear, and feel in the physical world, the verifiable world of cause and effect, somewhat akin to the great  spirit of native peoples on north America, as mentioned in that article Rout made us read during our last session. 

It seems to me this is what is most akin to what is really going on in reality.  I have not seen one scintilla of evidence with my own eyes that any sort of god has ever told anyone to do anything or who has ever done anything because of having been asked to do something in any sort of prayer.  Thus there is no way to have any sort of human-like relationship with any sort of god.  On the other hand one can believe in and have faith in the laws of nature.

This kind of god created by humans themselves would simply be a human spirit that infuses humans with confidence and courage, and an ability to see reality for what it is.  This god is similar to what was recommended in ‘The Evolution of Spaceship Earth, Inc.’  This is what I recommend today, that humans evolve such a god and spirit and forget about heaven and hell and dogma and doctrine and authoritarian threats.

Ellen—I am inclined to agree with you, Martin.  On the other hand, I do not believe most people would take this view.  Most people have been so ingrained with authoritarian religious notions and threats of everlasting hells and such, and even physical punishment on earth, such as beheadings, floggings, and stonings, and the like that they would never go along with this. Some people even remember that humans were burned at the stake for not believing certain religious dogmas and doctrines not too many years ago.

Margaret—As a civil servant for the government I can tell you in our current political culture you had better keep your mouth shut about such things when at work and at most places or you can damage your career.  You might not get fired for talking about such things but you can be punished in other ways, not promoted or not given decent raises.  The best thing to do about religion is not say anything about it in public.

Clarence—As a lawyer it’s interesting to me how religious people especially evangelicals keep trying to cram religious oriented laws down the throats of people, even the idea that there should not be separation of church and state, and god runs everything.  There are those in the US who are just like the Taliban in Afghanistan, who want to turn the US into a religious theocracy of some sort.  There are those who think that god should actually run the country. Remember Bush II telling us god told him to invade Iraq? We have had presidents in recent decades, such as Bush II who told the USian people that they actually did things like start major wars because a god told them to.  Now this is really problematic.  Did Bush II actually hear a voice in his head that he really thought was god who told him to go to war?  I doubt it.  Was he lying about this?  Most likely but who could prove it?  The problem is nothing about god can be proved, and consequently manipulators and despots can use the notion of god to manipulate people at will, which is lying of the worst kind, but there is nothing anyone can do about it. Trump does this sort of time all the time, even participating in religious rituals with a sanctimonious look on his face, and later saying to others in private he thought it was pure bullshit.

Napoleon—It’s similar to the don’t ask don’t tell policy of the military regarding homosexuals.  Just pretend it does not exist. Even if you believe it does.  There ain’t no way in hell to win that war.  People have been fighting over religion for centuries and nobody has ever won one yet.  Yet the major religions are as strong financially now as ever.  True enough there are more nonbelievers percentage-wise than there used to be.  I’m not sure about the numbers on this but I am pretty sure most people are not as brainwashed by religion as they used to be.

George—There is no way you can win an election in the US today if you do not pretend to believe, without saying things like god bless you and God bless America and such.  Bush II is a good example.  He got religion here in Texas when he lost an election for a minor post, and vowed he would never get out-Christianed again.  That’s why he started hearing god talking to him in his head, maybe after he gave up drinking.  When you get right down to it religions are like political parties.  People, some people at least, are so fearful of what will happen to them after they die that they will pay money to preachers to save them from hell, and some are so greedy that they will sell their souls on earth to get a better seat in heaven, but most in my opinion join religious organizations to gain political power and support in their communities to satisfy their own selfish day in and day out needs, or to help insure that they are not marginalized or punished in some way.  Joining a church makes people feel more secure, especially politicians, in their daily lives and careers, not only in their presumed afterlives.

Luke—I’ve stood it as long as I can.  I sold my soul to the devil for five thousand dollars a month to come to these meetings and put up with the blasphemy I’ve heard, and I have tried to keep my mouth shut, knowing full well it was hopeless trying to convince you sinners of the error of your ways.  I am now convinced this group is the work of the devil, a plot of Satan conceived in the very bowels of hell, where you people, or at least most of you, most assuredly deserve to go.  I have tried to pray for you and for your immortal souls, but I am losing my patience. You are damned for questioning and criticizing the holy word of the Lord. 

Julia—I wish we didn’t talk about this.  It makes me sick to my stomach. 

Paul—I wish we didn’t too, but we have to.  Who can sit back and watch and listen to what is happening to our world and not say something about what one thinks is the truth of the matter?  For sure some of the most serious hatreds and problems including wars are still being caused by or partly caused by religions and religious beliefs, dogmas, and doctrines.  What is the major cause of war?  I think the main cause is simply a lust for power and arrogance. People not only want to possess power but to have the ability to tell others what to do, bullies fighting other bullies just for the fun of it, but the next major cause of war is poverty, too few resources poorly distributed to satisfy needs, so one group or organization or country is always trying to steal resources from others. It’s built in to society, but religion is a factor since it enables people to get power, as has been discussed today.  What is the solution?  Outlaw religions?  Communist Russia tried that.  Look what happened. They not got poorer and poorer economically while they got politically more powerful developing nuclear bombs and military might, but they wound up getting rid of not only communism but atheism, after realizing shooting off their nuclear bombs would surely result in their own destruction.  Putin and Russia are now as hypocritical about religion as were Russian czars. The place is now run by Putin as a military dictatorship and oligarchy for the rich, using their longtime orthodox religion much the same as Russian czars did to manipulate and exploit serfs before the Russian Revolution of 1917.

Joan—As you know I work for an insurance company and I can tell you religion is not something you want to talk about at work in in a large insurance company.  In fact you don’t want to talk about anything but what you have to talk about doing your job.  Most people who work for a living do not have time to think about religion.  It is not only irrelevant it is unproductive. It saps the productive energy of workers.  One fringe benefit to having a good job like I have is that you do not have time for or any responsibility for even thinking about religion, you are free of it at work.  I think all people should be.

SESSION FIVE

MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA

MARCH 2020

Much discussion had occurred on various subjects but it was disjointed and unorganized.  Should Rout start writing some sort of book or report for the donors now letting them know what had transpired?  It was not easy keeping track of all the common threads in the discussions in terms of content, but it was even more difficult to accurately note and assess the changes that had occurred in the personalities of the group members.  The group had become more cohesive and more Game-free and it appeared some of them were now enjoying participating in the discussions rather than just going through the motions.

It was becoming clear the new Corona virus, Covid-19, was a real and serious threat and would cause The Group to cease operations in its current face-to-face format. Rout decided not to open this for discussion in this session. He would let the group members know what the donors had decided to do about the Covid pandemic during the first two weeks of April.

The Truther selected Marshall as the rooster crowed

Marshall—Well, being a weatherman it seems to me the biggest problem today is climate change, caused by human-caused global warming, burning too much fossil fuel. As you know there are no easy answers.  But probably the major problem is that must humans have not accepted the fact that human caused climate change has happened.  Personally, I think it goes back to the religion problem.  It seems to me most people believe a god will solve all their problems regarding the environment.  They do not believe the problem has to be nor can be managed by humans.  They believe since god is all powerful he must want the climate to be the way it is, since he created the earth and all its processes, including the climate.  And to some extent they are right. What power does the average person have to affect the climate working alone? Absolutely none if only a few individuals worked on the problem, but if all humans, all seven plus billion of them now on Earth, worked on the problem they could perhaps help correct the problem, by doing things such as driving cars less or changing their diets to consume less food produced by processes requiring fossil fuel.

Factory agriculture is a problem.  It requires using automated machinery instead of human energy to plant and till crops, machinery requiring the burning of fossil fuel as an energy source and instead of controlling weeds and insects by human energy chemical fertilizers are required, many of which are chemically derived from fossil fuel that has to be heated and processed.

I watched the town hall meeting last night and listened to the democratic candidates giving their opinions on climate change.  I was surprised that most of them agreed that climate change is real and is a threat.  Some of them hammered the point home that humans only have about eleven years before it will be too late to prevent catastrophic consequences, possibly extinction.

As several of them pointed out hundreds of human species are being rendered extinct right now, largely caused by increases in human population.  The human population has about doubled in the last fifty years requiring quantum increases in resources to feed and house them.  If the human population should double again in the next fifty years this alone could insure human extinction and the extinction of most other species on earth, largely because of habitat destruction.

As some of the candidates pointed out humans need to start thinking about Spaceship Earth more and worrying about their nations of origin less.  Selfishly pursuing your own interests as an individual or as a group, especially as a member of a large nation, could cause human extinction.  Selfishness is a major problem. Humans have got to think more altruistically and benevolently or else the end is nigh, or so it seems to me. 

How to get humans to do this it seems to me is a major problem.  This sort of change will require changing not only economic systems and but also religious systems. The capitalistic economic system is basically obsolete. How to shift from what we have now to a viable and feasible economic system is perhaps the greatest problem. 

Quite naturally this is going to require cooperation between nations and much less competition.  I agree with the author of the Evolution of Spaceship Earth that this is the way to go.  I’m not sure however whether we have enough time left for this sort of evolution to naturally occur and correct the problem.

John—it might be feasible to write computer code to use something like linear programming as suggested in the Evolution of Spaceship Earth, that Rout had us read back in the Asheville meeting, but how could you possibly make the required political and religious changes.  In all organizations the biggest problem is not writing computer code to make the organization more efficient but resistance on the part of managers and others who do not want their power an perks to be reduced.  If you look at this problem within countries the problem is horrible.  Can you imagine getting heads of all corporations worldwide and current stockholders within corporations worldwide to consent to turn over their power and perks to computer programmers who would write computer code to determine what and how resources would be used to produce and distribute the necessities of life to all humans around Earth in an optimum manner, including using clean green energy sources instead of fossil fuel.  It would require a massive redistribution of wealth the likes of which has never been seen on Earth before.

Socrates—Right on John. People have a will to power and having power is what makes the world go round.  You can build a case if you were to cut the power of people to this extent it would cause widespread depression, loss of self-esteem, life satisfaction, and whatnot.  What good would life be if there was nothing to work for as goals?  If all you had to do every day was sit around and wait for your dividend checks to get deposited in your bank account what sort of purpose in life would be this be.  In effect there would be no purpose for humans.  Relative to computer artificial intelligence systems they would be worse off than children relative to their parents in terms of dependence and the like.  Buckminster Fuller’s notion that humans should never do work that machines can do better is one of the most dangerous propositions I have ever heard of.

Sam—Yes, but what option do we have but to at least try to bring something of this nature about?  I assure you I will continue to write articles advocating this sort of thing,  the problem though is how do you get people to read such articles?  One of the major problems right now is that there is so much information out there from so many different sources on the Internet that no can possibly absorb it all.  How can anyone have any impact as an individual?  The national security administration right now can capture just about any human transmission that is made electronically, emails, Internet posts, and what have you.  They have a data center out in the middle of a desert capable of storing billions of transmissions daily.  The problem is even using computers they have no way of sifting through the data so as to pick out what is most relevant.  Most writers and social activists are preaching to their own choirs, small numbers of people.

Barbara—As a housewife I feel as if I am a fish out of water here but I will say something.  Most of you people are far more qualified than I am to say things to this group.  But what difference does it make if  you are qualified or not.  Nobody knows anything for sure.  When I am not taking care of my kids or doing chores around the house I do sometimes listen to the news and learn a little about what you are talking about here.  I have no idea what linear programming is and I know nothing about computer programming.  I have no idea how it’s done.  But I can tell you most of what you are talking about here would never be mentioned on the TV programs I watch.  Most people like me are totally shut off from these kinds of questions and issues.  I can’t imagine how anyone like me could possibly be of any value in working these sorts of problems out.  Why would you want to pay me five thousand dollars a day to just sit here and listen and say something about something I have no idea about is beyond me, but so long as you keep on payin’ out the money I have no choice but to keep on comin’ to these meetings.  I need the money for my family.

Albert—I’m with you Barbara, except I am a university professor, not a housewife, a professor of sociology, and I can assure you I am not qualified to write computer programs or depose corporate chief executives or convince politicians we need a new economic system.  But I can say something about class structures which are relevant here.  As Karl Marx pointed out most economic activity is class based, and classes evolved from high to low with a hierarchy and various levels of well-being, prestige and power.  It seems to me so far in history class structures have never been eradicated in societies.  This Spaceship Earth idea involves  a basically classless society, one class of shareholders in a giant monolithic corporation, owning one share of stock, who receive all their necessities of life as a dividend on their one share of ownership stock.  They in effect own Spaceship Earth, which if it were to be implemented today, would entail about seven and one half billion stockholders.   On the other hand, this system would allow humans to do other things on their own in small businesses and careers for additional money and rewards, based on their inherited abilities, whether artistic, athletic, or whatever, or do mundane service jobs for extra money if they wished.  In this sense there would still be a status hierarchy in such a society.  How you would regulate the winners in this process to prevent what the winners do now by exploiting the less fortunate I don’t know.  Would the AI computer system somehow do this.  Some people are now afraid AI robots could become so much more intelligent than humans that they would rule the roost at the top of the status hierarchy, and possibly decide to exterminate some or all humans.  If AI robots should develop general intelligence that exceeds human general intelligence as much as computer accuracy and data processing speed doing mathematical calculations now exceeds human capabilities, then what hope would humans have of ever controlling them? Quite a few smart people are beginning worry about this.

John—Yes, but bear in mind that up to now computers can only do what they have been programmed to do, and they cannot make mistakes.  They have to do what they are told at all times.  Abraham Lincoln said there are two types of people who never amount to much in life, those who cannot do what they are told, and those who cannot do anything but what they are told. Computers and AI up to now fall into the latter category. They are very useful efficient idiots. The issue is whether computers can ever learn to program themselves about something that has not already been programmed into their computer memories.  If they are never able to truly program themselves then if humans make sure they never tell them to do anything antisocial then nothing bad will happen.  At the same time one can also build a case that humans are incapable of programming themselves to do something that has not already been caused to happen in their memories. 

Ellen—I majored in accounting in college and I took some computer courses and learned a little something about programming but nothing we studied was remotely like what you are talking about here.  It is one thing to figure out how much money a business made in one year or what its assets and liabilities are but to think you could develop a system to produce and distribute goods all around Earth in an optimal fashion is off the charts.  I don’t think it could ever be done.

Bubba—I’m with you Ellen. I’m a farmer and I sure don’t want anyone telling me what to produce and who to sell it to.  Why that is pure socialism or communism.  And its un-American. Hell, anybody should know that is nothing but bullshit. Excuse my French.

Hellen—Being a nurse I can tell you no computer can ever take over my job.  Somebody has got to be there face to face to help people when they get sick or hurt.  You can use all the computers you want to diagnose diseases and prescribe treatments but there is no way you can program a  computer to do what nurses do, such as giving someone a shot for example, or taking blood pressure.  Such treatments would be part of the necessities of life, but it could not be allocated or produced by a computer, or would the computer decide who would be given treatment or not, in effect making decisions about who would live or die because of having some sort of disease but who could not have treatment?

Judy—I’m just a housewife too and I can tell you it would be nice for many of us to know that we would be entitled to food, clothing, and shelter because of owning one share of stock in Spaceship Earth.  What would it do? Have it delivered to your door using something like Amazon or Fed Ex.  I’m all for it.  Bring it on as soon as possible.

Andy—I would assume police services would be considered a necessity of life.  How would a computer allocate what us cops do?  Some things just cannot be decided by computers.  Or is it this wonderful computer system would somehow get rid of bad guys.  Would everyone being born rich so they did not have to work eliminate crime?  I doubt it. Some criminals just enjoy being criminals. They do it for the fun of it.  They get bored just sitting around doing nothing.  Seems to me this Spaceship Earth idea would make life boring as dirt.

Adam—It is interesting that the economics profession has historically had very little to say about the problem of boredom.  It was assumed if there were no limited resources that people would have sense enough to figure out how to entertain themselves.  Besides this Spaceship Earth idea assumes certain people would want to entertain others for extra pay.  Are you saying Andy that you think some people can only entertain themselves by committing crimes.

Andy—No, not necessarily, but I am saying I think some people like to commit crimes to entertain themselves.  They get some sort of kick out of it, some sort of psychological charge.

Trudy—For whatever it’s worth I can tell you as a psychotherapist that some people do like to commit crimes to satisfy their psychological needs.  There is a psychological Game called Cops and Robbers that has been identified by transactional analysts.  People get used to certain kinds of strokes for doing certain kinds of things in early childhood, such as being naughty and trying not to get caught.  People play psychological Games of all sorts for stimulus, structure, and recognition.  There is more to life than food, clothing, and shelter.

Martin got selected next by The Truther as the rooster crowed

Martin—It seems to me homelessness is one of the greatest problems in the US and around Spaceship Earth. For sure poverty is the majority cause or symptom but mental illness is also a cause.  Many of the homeless are indeed mentally ill.  The alternatives include constructing better mental health facilities and more treatment centers, and of course programs to eliminate poverty.  President Lyndon Johnson in the sixties in his Great Society program attempted to eliminate poverty in places like Appalachia and elsewhere.  Needless to say it did not work, or at least it did not work for long.  Poverty in the US is now increasing.  Curing poverty entails possibly doing many things, creating more government jobs, infrastructure jobs, requiring raising taxes and cutting military expenses among other things.  But you can also build the case that the capitalistic system is also to blame.  Some stay the solution is more socialism or socialism period.  I agree that we need more government ownership and control, more socialism.  That’s what I recommend.  And for sure I recommend Bernie Sanders for president in 2020.

Thank you Truther for selecting me to start a new discussion.

Marian—I am not sure I agree with you that homelessness is the most serious problem right now. I fully agree it is a serious problem for far too many people.  As a retired school teacher I am one of the lucky ones in that I have a defined benefits pension plan, something that is becoming more and more of a rarity in the US.  Corporations stopped providing them for most workers many years ago.  Thus my husband and I have a better retirement than most people, and we are not particularly worried about homelessness for ourselves.  On the other hand, many older retired people are.  Most of the homeless I am sure do not have even Social Security benefits if they are old enough to be retired.  Almost no one could live on the maximum Social Security benefit payment right now.  But for sure it helps.

I recommend that the government increase Social Security benefits by requiring rich people to pay the full Social Security premium on their full incomes, more than only on up to two hundred thousand dollars per year or whatever it is they now pay. That might be enough to keep Social Security solvent for a long time.  I have no idea whethwe it would be feasible to increase Social Security payments but for sure they need to be increased for most people.

Paul—I agree with you Marian, but the problem is that many people today will never have even the full Social Security benefit however inadequate that might be for retirement income. There are probably millions of people in the US who do not contribute to the Social Security system for a lifetime.  There are people working in the so-called underground economy who are paid in cash.  They are not listed as employed or unemployed with the government or employers.  Many are undocumented migrants.  This ties in with the whole employment problem, which is worsened by automation and AI.  More and more jobs are being taken over by machines. I read just a few days ago that McDonalds has now figured out a way to automate its order-taking process. Someone has invented a robot that can take orders and somehow dispense food. So even these low paid manual labor jobs could be eliminated. Truck drivers are at risk of having their jobs eliminated.  If you eliminate jobs currently requiring humans to drive some sort of motorized vehicle you are talking about a lot of unemployment. 

More and more the Spaceship Earth article Rout had us read in Asheville is becoming more and more relevant.  I have seen several Internet articles advocating basic income schemes.  One of the democratic presidential candidates, Yang, advocates allocating one thousand dollars a month to all citizens, which is more than the Social Security benefits of some citizens who retire now.  While the one thousand a month would help it would not be enough to live on.  The Spaceship Earth plan advocated distributing the necessities of life to all Earthian human citizens which for sure would cure the problem of retirement.  In effect no one would ever have to retire under this scheme since the necessity of life shipments would never cease until death, speaking of which, the article assumes natural deaths will result in a serious lowering of Earth’s human population through time through natural attrition, natural deaths exceeding births, until Earth’s human population reaches a sustainable level.

The overall problem however is horrendous.  What it boils down to is that billions of would-be workers alive around Spaceship Earth are basically unneeded as workers. You don’t need that many manual labor workers anymore.  What you need are thinkers and problem solvers, mind workers, if you will. Buckminster Fuller was quoted in The Evolution of Spaceship Earth as saying governments could eliminate all unemployment overnight by awarding mind grants to all citizens.  And for sure you don’t need that many billionaires, people who don’t work for a living but who travel around and do whatever they want to do thanks to the wealth they have inherited and/or amassed. And you sure as hell don’t need billionaires to provide surplus money for investments, grants, and such. Central bankers can create all the new funny money you need for this by just punching digits into computers and calling the numbers money.

To rationally allocate resources in the short run given where we are technologically and maintain even a semblance of the quality of life and human dignity we have now billions of humans would have to be provided the necessities of life free or the small percentage of humans alive who are currently needed for thinking and problem-solving work would have to sit back and watch billions of humans starve.

On the other hand, it seems to me there is little chance Yang’s idea of even one thousand dollars per month of basic permanent income happening in the US would have a chance of passing anytime soon.  And imagine trying to implement something like this around Spaceship Earth, now populated by almost eight billion humans.

I recommend however at least trying to implement something like Spaceship Earth Inc as soon as possible, which would require a serious overhaul of the capitalistic system.  Just saying we need socialism is tantamount to saying nothing because there is nothing concrete in such a statement, just poppycock and blather.

The Truther selected Sam as the rooster crowed

Sam—Well, it seems to me right now that the biggest economic and political problem around Spaceship Earth is this matter of polarization.  Not only in the United States but around the world people are getting more set in their ways and are getting angrier as their economic and political plights worsen, as their incomes stagnate or go down, as their lives become more and more precarious.  Here we are on the cusp of another global recession or depression, maybe worse than 2007, maybe as bad as the 1930s.  Trump is in the White House and Biden is being touted as the front runner of the Democratic National Committee.  He’s the obvious choice of the corrupt DNC and the Deep State as the Democratic presidential candidate for 2020 to run against Trump.  We will again be faced with the choice of choosing between the lesser of the evils, picked and manipulated to serve the interest of establishment politicians and the deep state. 

Maybe the most worrisome thing is what seems to be increasing anger and tendency to violence between extremists on the left and right.  I read on the Internet that regardless of who wins in 2020 there could be violence and bloodshed.  We have scattered shootings now by extremists or terrorists or whatever you want to call them in the US against other groups.  This sort of thing could worsen after the presidential election in 2020.

Regarding the alternatives for dealing with this I supposed the best thing we can do is resort back once again to the Hope for a Better Day Strategy.  Since there are no known answers at present.  What could be done that has not been tried.  This Game-free seminar approach was supposed to help correct this problem.  Well we have been talking in this group for several months now and I can’t tell it has done one whit worth of good in the broader environment.  Sure we have learned to tolerate one another more in this group given our diverse backgrounds, but what about similar groups in the outside world in the meantime. For sure they have not gotten any better off. Most are locked into their small worlds seeing and hearing the same stuff over and over. We have got nothing but politics as usual and more kicking the can down the road.  Humans not only in the US but in most European countries are following a similar path, and if anything right-wing extremists are gaining the upper hand.  It looks like humans are inexorably heading into a dystopian fascistic world, less freedom, less human dignity, less human security, with global warming and climate change hanging over their heads like a Sword of Damocles.

Of course I recommend that Rout and his donors make public what has happened in this group and spread the word that people can learn to get along better and see the viewpoints of other polarized people better if subjected to a Game-free group such as this one, especially if you pay them five thousand dollars a month to do it.  The problem is where are you going to get the kind of money these rich donors have coughed up for this experimental group.  Sure you can bribe people to get together in a group such as this if you have enough money, but how could this ever happen generally in the real world?  Rich people like being rich and they are not going to willingly give up their riches and power, which they think they honestly won and deserve.

But that’s about all I can think of recommending right now.  For sure I do not recommend any sort of military action.  That has been disastrous in the last five or six decades. All it’s done I can see is cause more and more military expenditures every year. Socialism? Big deal. How is it possible to even dream of making something like this happen anytime soon.  And what is socialism? There is no clear-cut definition of socialism, what degree of socialism etc.  More taxes? Sure raise the taxes of the rich as much as you can, but good luck, since they have already bought off the politicians, and voters keep voting for their friends who will also be bought off in Washington, inundated as it is with billions of dollars of lobbying bribery money flowing around the place like flood water from a massive hurricane. Infrastructure spending? Yes for sure. But where is the money to come from? Yes seriously raise taxes on the rich sending tax rates back to eighty percent or more, but good luck making it happen. Do you want to keep creating more funny money? Money is almost worthless now; seventeen percent of all sovereign debt around the world is now in negative interest rate money. People are loaning their worthless digital money to their governments at negative interest rates just hoping they will get some of it back to buy things with in ten or more years. How fucked up can an economic system get?

So I recommend to you my fellow Spaceship Earth DeGaming group members that you keep taking five thousand dollars for one day’s work or bullshitting as long as the donors see fit to dole it out. And I recommend trying to set up similar groups around Spaceship Earth as soon as possible by any means possible.  The only hope is to create new peaceful consensual answers to new economic and political systems.  What Earthians have now is not working.   

Paul­—I agree with you Sam.  Somehow Earthian humans have to improve their communication systems.  One can build a case right now the Earthian human world is insane.  Most economic and political systems are obsolete and dysfunctional for eighty or so percent of humans alive on earth, but some are satisfied, the rich, and powerful, and the brainwashed, the poor who think believing what they are told is somehow satisfying since they are actually superior to non-believers, believing believing what they believe will cause them to live in eternal bliss eternally after they die.

The only hope somehow is for Earthian humans to construct better educational systems.   And I am not talking about the current school and university educational systems around Earth. I am talking about the total educational process, starting at birth, the whole set of messages humans are exposed to from biological parents and others in their earliest years, and even the electro-chemical messages they receive in the wombs of birth mothers.  Somehow Earthian humans have to be given permission to think about reality itself, from an early age, not just believe what they are told, in many cases told by parents who do not have a clue about what is really going on, and may not care what is really going on, who spend their time watching soap operas, sports and entertainments and distractions of all sorts, political, religious, or Hollywood fantasy.

Luke—Ah, the one and only Paul, the fount of wisdom has spoken. And after several months of brainwashing I must say I am beginning to agree with him.  I must admit I don’t believe like I did.  I mightily fear in my heart of hearts that this might get me sent to hell for losing my faith. I still believe the one true Lord God is merciful. Maybe He will understand how I fell in with this group, knowing how much I needed the money. Maybe he will forgive me since this group made me do it.

Albert—Don’t worry Luke.  I think you will be fine.  One thing no one has brought up in our discussions is that in the beginning there was nothing in the universe except bosons and quarks.  There were no people.  Everything evolved from those basic particles over eons.  Humans came along several billion years after the first bosons and quarks started evolving into higher matter. If we go back to that so what. It will be part of a natural process, global warming or no global warming on Earth, a trivial event in cosmic history.  

As to there being an alternative universe nobody has ever seen before, even with the most powerful telescopes, I doubt there is such.  There is the slightest chance there might be I suppose, but I doubt it. 

Regarding the argument there must be something there or millions of people would not believe like Luke used to believe, it seems to me all religions came about because of the inherent unfairness, precariousness, and banality of human life.  People knew they would inevitably die, which was sad enough, and they knew that pain and misery could befall them at any time. Were they happy? Sure for fleeting moments but most of the time they lived under dread and anxiety, which caused them to fight for more resources than they really needed, trying to steal for gain and power and wealth, and so forth, and it caused them to assume there must be some sort of god-like forces making things happen, so they developed various religious systems.  In my opinion those who imagined there were multiple gods making things happen were more correct than those who imagined there was only one god making everything happen.  Any reasonably bright human would have known that various natural events were causing the plights of various members of their family and community.  Some died of this that or the other, some were killed by wild animals, snakes, and so forth, some were killed by hostile tribes. Some seemed to get through their short lives much easier and better than others. Many people assumed some sort of god must have blessed them, while they thought those who had horrible difficulties and problems probably brought it on themselves one way or another. 

In reality these effects observed by humans were the results of inevitable cause-effect chains existing in infinity.  Most likely there is no free will; if so everything is either accidental or inevitable, depending on how you look at it. Events are like dominoes falling in infinite cause-effect chains. Every event is both an effect and a cause of other events.  Rather than see that some people were merely unlucky enough to be the results of cause-effect chains producing certain diseases and negative events and others were lucky enough to be the result of cause-effect chains inevitably producing good health, good looks, intelligence, wealth, prestige, power, etc., they assumed gods and humans were making these anomalous unfair events happen, and thus various individuals deserved to be reviled, pitied, admired, praised, rewarded, condemned, punished, exterminated, etc. This un-managed unfair process enabled various kinds of power people (priests, preachers, kings, queens, barons, presidents, fascist dictators, corporate CEOs, generals, etc.) with communication skill and charisma to dominate weaker humans who believed power people were chosen favorites of the god(s), and thus were entitled to require weaker humans to hand over to them as their god-ordained rulers labor, food, money, and other necessities of life, for performing rituals and playing psychological Games, i.e. for Persecuting, Rescuing, and Victimizing various kinds of humans, groups, and organizations, practicing mumbo-jumbo.

The best hope for Earthian life is that new and better imagoes, scripts, schemata, and behaviors will be caused in human brains, hopefully causing humans around Earth to implement Game-free democratic I’m OK—You’re OK groups such as this one, that will help change a disastrous mindless master-servant I’m OK—You’re Not OK authoritarian course, that humans around Spaceship Earth have set, heading full-sail into hell on Earth.   

TO BE CONTINUED…

Support Teachers and Supplement Your Child’s Online Learning With These Tips

[Image Source: Pixabay]

By LISA WALKER


Regardless of what shape school takes for your child, be it remote, in-person, or some combination of the two, you’ve probably figured out there are advantages and disadvantages to learning at home. During these uncertain times, many parents have questions about sustaining their children’s mental and emotional well-being, supplementing their education, and accommodating specific needs while also supporting the teachers. We hope the following guidance will help.

Working With the Teacher Helps You and Your Child

You and the teacher share a common goal: providing the absolute best learning experience for your child. Supporting their teacher can give you an even better understanding of your kid while also offering you a chance to partner for your child’s best interest. There are a few things you can do to show your support and appreciation to the teacher.

Be Patient

Being patient and forgiving as the teachers try to figure things out is the best thing you can do. Everything changes rapidly – like guidelines teachers have no control over whatsoever – and because some parents have a hard time understanding this, it can create friction between you and your child’s teachers. Remember, you have a common goal: your child’s education.

It is also essential to check your emails and read them carefully. Because things are always changing, it’s critical to stay updated about what is happening at your child’s school.

Let the Teacher Know If Something Isn’t Working

Many things that are happening in schools and online are new for teachers and students alike, so if you notice something isn’t working, you should speak up. Open communication is crucial, and teachers are willing to work with parents to change how they do things.

‘Thank You’ Goes a Long Way​

Write a short thank-you note or an email showing you value them or have your child make a card. Just let the teacher know you appreciate their efforts in a friendly way.

Supplement Your Child’s Education

Depending on your child’s learning style and age, you may need to support them differently; however, you can do a few things – no matter your child’s age and study style – to keep them on track while they are learning online.

Plan a Routine Together

Try to set up a routine that factors in online learning, homework time, and age-appropriate programs to watch online or on TV. Also, include playtime, reading time, or various Look for ways to enjoy these activities together so you can spend quality time with your child.

Have Open Conversations

Encourage your child to ask questions and voice their feelings. Keep in mind that your children will each have a different stress response, so be understanding and patient. You can do this by inviting your child to share their thoughts about something and follow their lead. Also, ​​make sure your child has the materials necessary to complete all assignments, whether it’s a laptop, schools supplies, a Wi-Fi connection, or a PDF reader – whatever they need to complete their work.​

Provide an Environment Conducive to Learning

Providing a great environment that helps your child with learning isn’t always easy. If they’re isolated, it can be challenging to check in with them, but if they learn at the kitchen table, for instance, they may be too distracted. It is even more difficult when everyone is at home, and the family is complaining or arguing.

For one thing, tension and clutter can cause major distress. To alleviate these triggers, it’s crucial to make some changes around the home. Open the blinds or curtains to allow in as much natural light as possible; a lack of natural light can negatively impact mood and focus, making you and your child feel tired, which can hamper concentration levels. Decluttering and cleaning can infuse your home with positivity, which in turn helps to relieve stress, eliminate tension, and improve the whole family’s sense of well-being.

Provide Immediate Positive Feedback

​Every time your child concludes a distance learning instruction, provide positive feedback. This can be as simple as placing a checkmark or a sticker on the assignment, but it can make a significant contribution in helping to motivate your child.


With a bit of creative thinking and effort by you, as well as your child’s teachers, your child will continue to build their skills, knowledge, and confidence, and have a great learning experience.

__________________________________

Lisa Walker is the proud SAHM (Stay at Home Mom) of two adorable but feisty sons. She enjoys trail hiking and beach-coming with her husband Jake when not busy with her boys and home improvement projects. She created NeighborhoodSprout.org as a passion project to share her love of homeownership with others.

PRESIDENT BIDEN AS SEEN FROM A HUMBLE PERSON’S PERSPECTIVE FROM THE CARIBBEAN.

By COURTENAY BARNETT

We all can breathe a sigh of relief that Donald Trump is no longer in the White House. Yes, but I am now a bit older than in 2008 when Obama made his way in for a first in Presidential history and along with many others I then felt a sense of satisfaction that America had finally moved on. However, reality did set in as the events unfolded. 

This time around there is no real thrill nor anything but a willingness to make a calm and less than enthusiastic assessment of what America really faces. I think I can categorise into three sections – the knowns – the unknowns – and the in-betweens 

Knowns 

America faces an unprecedented combination of challenges. On the economic front if one is to remove  the blinders, then the country is comparable to 1930s depression days challenges; on the cultural and political front the country is deeply divided – if only one considers the need to have thousands of troops and disinvite the public at large from celebrating the inauguration of their new president; and on the health and medical front America finds that it has had more people who have died from covid-19 than soldiers lost in all of World War 11. These ‘knowns’ are  more than a handful for any President – but there are more to the ‘knowns’ . 

Biden will ( rather already has) reversed via Executive Orders a significant list of Trump era policies.  

Unknowns 

There are big issue items for Biden to deal with and these can be but guessed at right now. Troops will remain in Afghanistan and in northern Syria. There may be some reversal on the excesses of Israel in seeking to have East Jerusalem as the unified capital and on-going settlement expansions ( maybe Biden  will seek to rein in these provocations). He is unlikely to comment on the recent Apartheid law which reserves certain offices for Jews only. The fundamental support of the US for Israel will not change otherwise. At a guess the Biden will return to the Iran deal. I assume that Biden will want to restore the Obama era rapprochement with Cuba. 

In- betweens 

I can but gawk at the US approach towards Venezuela in seeking to dictate to the Venezuelan people who should be their president as chosen by the US for them. It remains to be seen whether or not Biden will move in the direction of less bullying towards Venezuela. Note – I said ‘less bullying’ – for I still anticipate bullying to continue – only question is to what degree.  

With regards to China, Biden being a rational person, I assume, will not pursue Trump’s trade war but instead will seek to engage in negotiations with China over trade rules.  

Overall 

It is the economy and the structural instability which is America’s present really big challenge. I do not see or anticipate Biden doing here what is logical and necessary ( albeit overall I see him as a rational and sensible man). America knows its problem of having a massive deficit and permitting the military-industrial complex to command almost half of its entire budget. The latter exacerbates the former. Yet, each new president continues down that path which  serves well to worsen the overall economic problem. What Biden will do is pump in a massive stimulus package which will serve well to boost the economy and improve the jobs situation.  

My approach would be a 1930s form of stimulus from bottom up; Biden, at a guess, will be closer to a Obama 2008 top down form of injection of funds.  

So there – that is how I see it. 

Congratulations President Biden! 

________________________________________

COURTENAY BARNETT is a graduate of London University. His areas of study were economics, political science and international law. He has been a practising lawyer for over thirty years, and has argued public interest and human rights cases. He has published numerous articles in the Effective Learning Report. He lives and works in the Caribbean